Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />Table 1. Number of northern pike sampled by year and river reach in the Yampa River. <br /> RIVER REACH <br />YEAR <br />Craig <br />Juniper <br />Maybell <br />Lily <br />Park <br />Yampa <br />Canyon Total <br />NO. <br />1986' - 3 4 - - 7 <br />1987' - 2 6 4 - 12 <br />1988 31 3 29 28 - 91 <br />1989 100 34 23 12 1 175b <br />1990 78 20 24 18 2 143° <br />1991 55 15 23 34 1 128 <br />TOTAL 264 77 109 96 4 556 <br />Fish sampling was for radiotag implantation only. <br />b Includes 5 fish recaptured by anglers; 3 from Elkhead Reservoir, 2 from unreported locations. <br />Includes 1 fish recaptured by an angler from Elkhead Reservoir. <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />t <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />Examination of potential trends in northern pike numbers over years and reaches was <br />considered possible due to the consistency of sampling effort in time and space within well- <br />defined backwater habitat. As indicated previously, sampling was accomplished primarily in <br />discrete backwater habitats in a stabilized river channel. In the Juniper, Maybell, and Lily Park <br />reaches, backwater habitats were similar in number and location due to the relatively "fixed" <br />nature of the river channel, lack of numerous secondary channels, and creation of backwater <br />habitat annually at tributary mouths. It was assumed that northern pike captured in these habitats <br />used them due to biological need or preference, and that the proportion of fish using these <br />backwater habitats reflected the species' population abundance in the reach. Each backwater <br />habitat was considered a sampling unit since they were all sampled consistently the same. <br />Therefore at the individual habitat level, sampling effort was assumed to be equal. At the reach <br />level, all backwaters in the Juniper, Maybell, and Lily Park reaches were sampled one or more <br />times per year, and sampling effort differed mostly as a result of the period of time they were <br />available for sampling. Comparison of catch rate estimates for northern pike and other species <br />is presented in the habitat association section of the report. <br />Len tg_h frequency distributions <br />Lengths of 542 northern pike collected ranged from 87 to 1118 mm total length and <br />examination of their frequency distribution was possible by years and river reaches. Over the <br />four time periods shown, the length frequency distributions did not demonstrate any notable <br />M <br />March <br />March 11, 1996 <br />16