Laserfiche WebLink
<br />viii <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />River demonstrated robust weight gain with increasing length. <br /> <br />Based on length frequency distributions of predators and prey and predator gape sizes, <br />most small-bodied fish species in Colorado River backwaters were vulnerable to predation by the <br />sizes of the centrarchid fish species present. Eighty percent of the nonnative cyprinid populations <br />sampled in backwaters were of suitable prey size to largemouth bass larger than 110 mm in length. <br />Largemouth bass was the most piscivorous of the nonnative gamefish species present. Largemouth <br />bass and green sunfISh diets suggest an opportunistic mode of predation. The relative impact of <br />predation on native fish by nonnative gamefish species in Colorado River backwaters was judged <br />to be relatively small due to small gamefish numbers or low frequency of fish ingestion, and a <br />relatively large alternative fish prey base comprised of nonnative cyprinids. Due to their <br />numerical dominance, red shiner and fathead minnow may be a much more significant competitive <br />threat to the growth and survival of latval and young-of-year Colorado pikeminnow and razorback <br />sucker young compared to predation by nonnative game fish species. <br /> <br />Concentrations of centrarchids in some backwaters may present a locaIized predatory <br />impact to all fishes present. Habitat suitability criteria for centrarchid fish species suggest the <br />Colorado River mainchanne1 environment is not conducive to their reproduction or smvival. 00- <br />channel habitats approaching or mreting these suitability criteria of low flow velocity and wanner <br />water are more likely to support and maintain populations of centrarchid gamefish that may <br />subsequently contribute escaped fish to native fish habitats. Centrarchids may also tend to <br />concentrate in floodplain ponds and backwater complexes intended for endangered fish nursery <br />habitats. <br /> <br />Potential competitive pressure for fish prey between adult channel catfish and adult <br />Colorado pikeminnow does not appear high based on differences in their relative frequency of fish <br />ingested and the abundance of nonnative cyprinids as a potential prey base. However, greater <br />numbers of channel catfish in backwaters and the mainchanne1 compared to Colorado pikeminnow <br />make competition for available fish prey a possibility. Spawning by channel catfish in the <br />Colorado River is most likely affected by temperature regime, which may impede catfish <br />reproduction, and survival and growth of young in some years. Reproduction and recruitment <br />appears adequate to maintain the catfish population over time. The relative abundance of adult <br />channel catfish in Colorado River backwaters in July may pose a predation problem for survival <br />and recruitment of young razorback sucker based on evidence from Lower Basin studies of <br />channel catfish predation on stocked razorback sucker juveniles. <br /> <br />Nonnative small-bodied cyprinids, common carp, and channel catfish should be a primary <br />focus of nonnative fish control actions in the Colorado River to reduce their abundance in potential <br />nursery habitats for Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker. Mechanical removal of <br />nonnative fish from backwaters via seining and mechanical removal of channel catfish and <br />common carp from summer backwaters via trapping or controlled harvest should be evaluated for <br />short-term benefits to Colorado pikeminnow, razorback sucker, and other native fish species. <br />Limiting escapement of centrarchids and other nonnative gamefish from sportfisheries in <br />