My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9591
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9591
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:59:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9591
Author
Nesler, T. P.
Title
Interactions Between Endangered Fishes and Introduced Gamefishs in the Colorado River, Colorado, 1986-1991.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
91-29,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />compared to the existing presence of largemouth bass and green sunfish and native fish species <br />so the probabilities of prey selection by centrarchids for native fish prey are likely to be small. <br />The fish diet of largemouth bass and green sunfish collected in Colorado backwaters suggested <br />more opportunism versus increased vulnerability of one fIsh species over another. Nyberg (1971, <br />cited in Osmundson 1987) indicated largemouth bass rely almost exclusively on sight for detecting <br />and pursuing prey. Turbidity in Colorado River backwaters could inhibit sight-feeding selectivity <br />by largemouth bass and promote a more opportunistic feeding approach. <br /> <br />Green sunfish do not seem to pose a significant predation problem in Colorado River <br />backwaters to other fish species. This is attnbuted to the relatively small numbers and small size <br />of green sunfISh present throughout the spring-to-fall seasons relative to other fish species. Other <br />studies have established green sunfish as a significant piscivore in small stream habitats, and <br />demonstrated the influence of green sunfISh on native fish species and communities (Lem1y 1985, <br />Lohr and Fausch 1996). Other studies, such as Osmundson (1987), Marsh and Langhorst (1988) <br />and Muth and Beyers (Lentsch 1996) demonstrate green sunfish will prey on Colorado <br />pikeminnow and razorback sucker young in laboratory and non-riverine situations. Evidence for <br />similar effects in habitats in the Colorado River was not supported by these results. The <br />,relatively low frequency of occurrence of fIsh predation by green sunfish in Colorado River <br />backwaters may be in part due to traits described in Lohr and Fausch (1996) concerning <br />crepuscular feeding habits and high gastric evacuation rates associated with this species. The <br />authors suggested these traits contnbuted to a lack of fish in green sunfish stomachs from samples <br />collected during the day. Crepuscular activity by green sunfish is supported by the 1991 nighttime <br />sampling of backwaters conducted in this investigation. It is possible that the frequency of <br />occurrence of fish prey in green sunfish in the Colorado River is higher than indicated by these <br />results since all stomach samples were collected during the daytime. Another potential effect <br />might be that daytime sampling contributed to the higher percentage occurrence of fish remains <br />and unknown species as categories in the diet assessment since digestion of fISh prey ingested the <br />previous night had progressed too far to enable identification of species. However, the relative <br />abundance of nonnative cyprinid prey and prey species occurrence in green sunfish stomachs <br />suggest predation on native fish species by green sunfish is not disproportionate. <br /> <br />Encounters between centrarchid predators and Colorado pikeminnow YOY prey would be <br />infrequent compared to interactions with red shiner and fathead minnow. Diet overlap <br />assessments (McAda and Tyus (1984), McAda and Kaeding (1989), Muth and Snyder (1995)) and <br />the competition study results of Beyers et aI. (1994) suggest red shiner and fathead minnow may <br />pose a significant competitive threat to the growth and survival of Colorado pikeminnow and <br />razorback sucker young. Based on the numerical dominance of these species in Colorado River <br />backwaters found in this and other studies, the potential impacts from nonnative cyprinids appears <br />more significant compared to threats posed by mostly juvenile nonnative centrarchid gamefish <br />species. An alternative hypothesis would be that these centrarchid predators, distributed in small <br />numbers over the available backwater habitat, are selectively preying upon Colorado pikeminnow <br />larvae ad YOY throughout the summer season, and reducing them to the levels of scarcity <br />observed annually in standardized monitoring in September. The prey species frequency of <br /> <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.