My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9591
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9591
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:59:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9591
Author
Nesler, T. P.
Title
Interactions Between Endangered Fishes and Introduced Gamefishs in the Colorado River, Colorado, 1986-1991.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
91-29,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />collected and the perceived need to add sampling effort in backwaters to capture larger fish. <br /> <br />Seine sampling was conducted using a 1.2 x 4.6 m beach seine with 3.2 mm ace mesh. <br />The 30-55 mile reach was stratified into 5-mile segments within which the first and second <br />backwaters encountered in each segment were sampled with two seine hauls per backwater. <br />Minimum depth of any sample should be 0.3 m, and area sampled had to comprise approximately <br />25 % of the total area of the backwater. Width and length of each seine haul was recorded. <br />Within the seine sample area, maximum depth was recorded, and also depth halfway between ~h <br />shoreline and the maximum depth point. Other data recorded included river mile location, <br />backwater type (main or side channel), backwater length, backwater and mainchannel temperature, <br />and maximum depth of the backwater. In 1988, if the backwater sampled was triangular or oddly- <br />shaped, measurements were also made across the mouth, mid-section and tip to better approximate <br />surface area (backwater length x average width). Total area seined and total area of backwaters <br />sampled were taken for each year from McAda et al. (1994: Table B-4, Appendix E-Table B-1). <br /> <br />All fish collected per seine haul were examined briefly in the field to identify and <br />enumerate common, nongame fish species, and release these fish back into the river. All gamefish <br />identified were separated and kept for length measurement and stomach samples. Stomachs were <br />removed from larger fish (>25 mm total length) and preselVed in 10% formalin solution. <br />Smaller fish were preseIVed whole. The remainder of the fish sampled were preselVed in formalin <br />for identification or screening at the CSU Larval Fish Lab in Fort Collins, Colorado. Only the <br />first seine sample in each backwater sampled within ISMP and the 15-mile reach was processed <br />at the Larval Fish Lab in Fort Collins, Colorado for total enumeration of all fish species. Apart <br />from the tw~seine sample requirement of ISMP, extra seine hauls were made in some backwaters <br />if the presence of gamefish species warranted the effort to increase sample size. Stomach contents <br />were analyzed for the number and taxonomic identity of all fish species ingested. Other food <br />items were identified only to Order or Family when possible, but not enumerated. <br /> <br />Adult fish monitoring results in the study area acquired through ISMP shoreline <br />electrofishing from 1986-1988 indicated a lack of largemouth bass in mainchannel habitats. Adult <br />largemouth bass, among other adult gamefish predators, were suspected to occur in backwater <br />habitats in the Colorado River, but were being missed by ISMP sampling. In 1989 and 1990, <br />sampling was expanded to include adultllarge fish sampling trips in April and July using a block <br />and shock technique. This sampling technique involved blocking of a backwater where it joins <br />the river channel with a trammel net (150 mm mesh outer walls, 25 nun mesh inner panel). With <br />the blocking net in place, the backwater habitat was sampled using electrofishing equipment <br />(Coffelt VVP-15, 5000 watt generator, 25 em diameter stainless steel sphere anodes) mounted on <br />a flat-bottomed john boat. Output power was lowered during an initial pass to induce fish to <br />attempt to leave the backwater to avoid the electric field and become entangled in the trap net. <br />Output power was increased on subsequent passes to increase attraction, stunning and dip net <br />capture of remaining fish. During the approach to the blocking net under increased output <br />voltage, power was decreased near the net to minimize electrofishing injuries to fish already <br />captured in the blocking net. The target of this sampling included all juvenile and adult fish <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.