Laserfiche WebLink
Macroinvertebrates <br />Macroinvertebrate sampling and analysis were conducted at four sites in the spring of <br />2001 and five sites in the fall of 2001 and spring 2002. The results provided by the <br />applied metrics are presented in Table 5. Complete species lists are provided in <br />Appendix B. The results from the applied metrics provided a measure of longitudinal <br />changes in macroinvertebrate communities as well as a seasonal comparison. The <br />following section describes the range and results of the applied metrics. These results <br />will be further evaluated in the discussion section. <br />Diversity and evenness values were evaluated for each site on each sampling date. These <br />metrics are influenced by similar processes and often indicate similar trends. Diversity and <br />evenness values were used to detect changes in macroinvertebrate community structure. In <br />unpolluted waters diversity values typically range from near 3.0 to 4.0. In polluted waters <br />this value is generally less than 1.0. The evenness value ranges between 0.0 and 1.0. <br />Values lower than 0.3 are generally considered indicative of organic pollution (Ward et al. <br />2002). Diversity ranged from 2.03 to 3.80 during this study, while evenness ranged from <br />0.406 to 0.707. On each sampling occasion the lowest values for both metrics were <br />obtained at FPR-RES. Some decline in these values was also observed at RFR-C during the <br />spring sampling events. A comparison of diversity values between spring sampling events <br />indicated a similar spatial trend (Figure 36). This pattern was also observed for evenness <br />values (Figure 37). <br />Diversity and evenness values exhibited some fluctuation between sites and sampling <br />events, but remained within a range suggesting good or excellent water quality at most <br />locations. These metrics are designed to indicate different types of disturbance, and are <br />often used as indicators of pollution. Low values that were observed at the site below the <br />dam were likely a result of the restraints imposed by regulated releases from the dam. <br />The FBI is often used in macroinvertebrate studies as a means of detecting organic <br />enrichment. In this study it was useful for monitoring differences between the sites that may <br />Draft Final Report, Fryingpan and Roaring Fork Rivers February 12, 2003 <br />Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. Page 42