Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 25. Bed profile and water surface elevations for pool cross section at FPR- <br />HG. Elevation is relative elevation based on a vertical base of 100 m. <br />100.50 r <br />100.00 <br />99.50 <br />- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br />E ------------------------------------ <br />C <br />° 99.00 <br />v <br />Bed Profile <br />98.50 1.13 cros (40 cfs) <br />- - - 1.70 cros (60 cfs) <br />- 2.27 cros (80 cfs) <br />98.00 <br />- • • - 2.83 cros (100 cfs) <br />5.66 cros (200 cfs) <br />97.50 <br />0 5 10 15 20 <br />Station (m) <br />25 <br />Wetted perimeter remains relatively uniform at high flows with the inflection point for <br />the riffle cross section (T6) occurring at 4.25 in 3/S (150 ft3/s) (Figure 22). Appendix A <br />includes pictures of FPR-HG at three different flow levels (Figures A5-A7). <br />An analysis of the WUA output using a habitat time series approach, indicates that <br />rainbow and brown trout had more suitable habitat after dam construction than before at <br />site FPR-HG (Figures 26 and 27). Only during a couple of short duration (1-2 week) <br />occasions did pre-dam habitat meet or exceed post-dam habitat. Significant increases in <br />habitat from pre-dam to post-dam conditions were observed during the baseflow period. <br />A reduction in overall habitat during the spring peak flows is evident for all species- <br />lifestage combinations at this site (Figures 26 and 27). <br />The low gradient reach (represented by FPR-LG) of the river had the highest overall <br />WUA values of all three reaches. The average discharge for maximum WUA values was <br />4.93 in 3/S (174 ft3/s). This value is intermediate between sites FPR-HG and FPR-BP. <br />However, as with FPR-HG and FPR-BP, all life stages showed declining habitat <br />Draft Final Report, Fryingpan and Roaring Fork Rivers February 12, 2003 <br />Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. Page 33