Laserfiche WebLink
81 <br />Some artificially-protected areas were noted at <br />Station Y-1 behind large concrete slabs. The radical <br />channel alterations constructed in 1976 at this station <br />produced a segment similar to that at Y-2, with a "raceway" <br />of low habitat diversity adjoining a sluggish backwater. <br />Again, the probability of loss of reproductive isolation, <br />by removal of original spawning habitat, was high. <br />Habitat reduction at Stations Y-1 and Y-2 does not <br />explain the abundance of white X flannelmouth and white X <br />bluehead sucker hybrids compared to hybrids between the <br />flannelmouth and bluehead suckers. If all suckers were <br />induced to spawn in the crowded backwater reaches at the <br />same time, similar proportions of the three hybrid types <br />would be expected. Low proportions of bluehead X flannel- <br />mouth hybrids even under stress conditions indicate mainte- <br />nance of the temporal reproductive isolation usually <br />attributed to sympatric fishes which evolved together in <br />an area isolated from outside biotic influences. <br />The relative abundance of white X flannelmouth sucker <br />hybrids at Station Y-3 was influenced by capture of several <br />such fish on one sampling date. Hybrids were not common <br />at Station Y-3 on other dates. White X flannelmouth hybrid <br />occurrence reflects abundance at Station Y-3 of the latter <br />parent but is not consistent with the relative scarcity of <br />the other parent. River conditions at Station Y-3 were con- <br />sidered relatively unchanged by channelization, and spawning <br />areas were numerous. It is likely that such hybrids were