Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />for Colorado River larval fishes, a project sponsored by the Bureau of <br /> <br />Land Management. Likewise, the methodology necessary to quantify in- <br /> <br />stream conditions for endangered fishes is in the developmental stages. <br /> <br />Some of the data collected was used by the Cooperative Instream Flow <br /> <br />Service Group to fine tune their ~ncremental habitat analysis technique. <br /> <br />STUDY AREA <br /> <br />The, '. Colorado squawfish and humpback chub are endemic. to the Colorado <br />:( <br /> <br />River drainage. Three criteria were used to select the trend zones: <br /> <br />1) Colorado squawfish or humpback chubs must have occurred in the area <br /> <br />within the last 10 years; 2) the area must be acces~ib1e to a field <br /> <br />inventory crew; and, 3) the area must be representative of other por- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />tions of the river. Five trend zones are indicated on the contour maps <br /> <br />in this report (Figs. 1-6) and are located as follows: <br /> <br />Yampa River: (T7N, R95W, Sec. 20 to T7N, R96W, Sec. 20 of the 6th P.M.) <br /> <br />This area was 16 km <br /> <br />long and located in Moffat County between Maybell <br /> <br />and Sunbeam, Colorado (Figs. 1 and 2); <br /> <br />White River: (TIN, R96W, Sec. 6 to T2N, R98W, Sec. 18 of the 6th P.M.) <br /> <br />This area was also 16 km <br /> <br />long and was located in Rio Blanco County <br /> <br />between Rio Blanco Lake and the County Road 65 bridge (Figs. 1 and 3); <br /> <br />Colorado River: (TIS, R2E, Sec. 3 to TlS, RlE, Sec. 23 of the Ute P.M.) <br /> <br />This area was approximately 12km <br /> <br />long and was located in Mesa County <br /> <br />between Palisade and Clifton, Colorado (Fig. 4); <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4 <br />