Laserfiche WebLink
400 <br />0 <br />Z 200 <br />O <br />U <br />W <br />to 0 <br />cc <br />w <br />C- 75,000 <br />H <br />LU 50,000 <br />U <br />Fn 25,000 <br />U 0 <br />Z <br />3i 30,000 <br />O <br />0- 20,000 <br />Lu 10,000 <br />(n 0 <br />} <br />Q 100 <br />0 <br />Z <br />w 50 <br />Z> <br />A Mean <br />- ---- Median - <br />Period of record 1950-83 - <br />- sr - - <br />=B = <br />1922-49 - <br />-1950-62 - C 90 Percentile ------ 10 Percentile - <br />- --- Median - <br />Jutf% <br />..?.,yv\• .vJ II U ?? ??P? ? ?"' v ?ir? <br />!- ?t I\ I I I I I <br />- Mean Period of record 1950-83 - <br />--- Median <br />OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT <br />Figure 25. Mean daily streamflow at selected sites in main-stem subregion of San Juan region. A, Site 58, <br />Dirty Devil River above Poison Spring Wash, near Hanksville, Utah. B, Site 69, Colorado River at Lees <br />Ferry, Ariz. C, Site 69, Colorado River at Lees Ferry, Ariz., showing selected non-exceedance probabilities <br />during the principal filling period (1966-80). D, Site 70, Paria River at Lees Ferry, Ariz.). <br />low-flow months, but did not change annually. A significant <br />decrease of 27 mg/L in median annual bicarbonate concen- <br />tration was indicated between the two periods. Although not <br />statistically significant, the mean annual concentration of <br />calcium decreased and all other constituents increased. <br />Upstream changes in water use probably would not decrease <br />the concentration of calcium and bicarbonate, and the <br />estimated loss may be from precipitation of calcite in the <br />reservoir. <br />Annual monotonic-trend analyses of the preinterven- <br />tion period indicated a significant increase in median annual <br />dissolved-solids concentration of 7.3 mg/L per year (table <br />10). This represents a 33-percent change in median annual <br />concentration during the 21-year period. Median annual flow- <br />adjusted concentration also increased significantly by 3.3 <br />mg/L per year, which represents a 14-percent change dur- <br />ing the period of record. These increases result from increas- <br />ing development and decreasing streamflow upstream in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin. No statistically significant <br />annual monotonic trends were indicated for the principal fill- <br />ing period, except that concentrations of calcium and bicar- <br />bonate decreased by 1.04 mg/L per year, which _may result <br />from increasing calcite precipitation as the reservoir filled. <br />Paria River at Lees Ferry, Ariz. (site 70) <br />Site 70 (table 3, pl. 1) is near the confluence of the <br />Colorado River, about 1 mi downstream from site 69. <br />Although streamflow of the Paria River averages less than <br />0.5 percent of the streamflow of the Colorado River at site <br />69, flows at the two sites normally are added together to result <br />in the official flow leaving the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />at Lee Ferry, Ariz. Water-quality analyses for the Paria River <br />are few, and dissolved-solids data are reported only to <br />generally indicate dissolved-solids concentrations in the Paria <br />River. Although streamflow and dissolved-solids load are <br />less than those for site 58, areal runoff is comparable at both <br />sites (table 9). The pattern of seasonal streamflow is similar <br />at both sites, except that runoff from thunderstorms is a <br />greater part of the total streamflow in the Paria River (fig. <br />25D). Mean annual flow-weighted dissolved-solids concen- <br />Main-Stem Subregion 57