My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9521
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9521
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:38:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9521
Author
Liebermann, T. D., D. K. Mueller, J. E. Kircher and A. F. Choquette.
Title
Characteristics and Trends of Streamflow and Dissolved Solids in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SITE 21 <br />Colorado River near Cisco, Utah (site 21) <br />Site 21 (table 3, pl. 1) is the farthest downstream site <br />in the Grand region. The streamflow hydrograph for this site <br />depicts the progressive depletion and regulation of flow in <br />the Grand region since streamflow-gaging records began in <br />1914 (fig. 12F). Since 1966, mean annual streamflow has <br />averaged about 4.8 million acre-ft and mean annual <br />dissolved-solids load has averaged about 3.7 million tons <br />(table 5). Chemical composition is affected by irrigation- <br />return flows from Mancos Shale areas, such as the Grand <br />Valley, and inflow from the saline springs in the Dotsero- <br />Glenwood Springs area and the Dolores River basin. Dur- <br />ing snowmelt runoff, calcium, sulfate, and bicarbonate are <br />the predominant ions; during base flow, sodium and sulfate <br />predominate. Because of inflow from the Dolores River, the <br />proportion of chloride is larger at site 19 than at site 18 <br />upstream. <br />The period of record was separated into three inter- <br />vals: A preintervention period (1929-49), a middle period <br />(1950-65), and a postintervention period (1966-83). The <br />intervals were divided based on construction of the Alva B. <br />Adams Tunnel/Lake Granby (1950, when full operation of <br />the project began) and Blue Mesa Reservoir (1966). Annual <br />step trends resulting from Alva B. Adams Tunnel/Lake <br />Granby between 1929-49 and 1950-65 indicated a signifi- <br />cant decrease in dissolved-solids load of 594,000 tons/yr <br />(table 4). This decrease was 14 percent of the preinterven- <br />tion median. The loads of dissolved sulfate, bicarbonate, and <br />sodium decreased during the snowmelt season, and the <br />dissolved chloride load decreased during the low-flow season. <br />Annual step-trend analysis, for changes resulting from Blue <br />Mesa Reservoir between the periods 1950-65 and 1966-83, <br />detected no significant changes in annual medians, except <br />for a decrease in dissolved-sulfate load of 137,000 tons/yr. <br />Monthly step trends indicated that from September through <br />March, streamflow increased and dissolved-solids concen- <br />tration decreased, probably due to increased reservoir regula- <br />tion (fig. 13). <br />Annual monotonic trends were analyzed for the three <br />intervals at site 21. For the preintervention period, increased <br />streamflow and decreased dissolved-solids concentration <br />were detected during the low-flow season. These trends cor- <br />responded to trends detected at sites 5 and 10 and probably <br />are from winter releases from Green Mountain and Taylor <br />Reservoirs. No statistically significant annual trends were <br />detected for the preintervention and middle periods. For the <br />postintervention period, a marginally significant decrease in <br />median annual flow-adjusted concentration of 2.9 mg/L per <br />year was detected (table 6). This trend represents a 9-percent <br />decrease in the median annual flow-adjusted concentration <br />during the 18-year period (1966-83) and corresponded to <br />similar decreases in the Gunnison River subregion. <br />100,000 <br />w <br />JO LL 50,000 <br />LL W <br />Cr <br />?¢ U <br />? ¢ o <br />?Z <br />_50,000 <br />(n 15,000 <br />o(n <br />M Z <br />0 ° 0 <br />0Z <br />w- <br />0 Q 15,000 <br />Lno <br />0 -30,000 <br />MONTH <br />EXPLANATION <br />Highly significant (p 50.01) <br />® Significant (0.01< p<_ 0.05) <br />® Marginally significant (0.05<p5_0.10) <br />Figure 13. Step trends at site 21 (Colorado River near Cisco, <br />Utah) from 1950-65 to 1966-83. <br />General Trends in the Grand Region <br />Annual streamflow in the Grand region has been <br />progressively depleted by transbasin exports. Exports and <br />reservoir regulation have decreased streamflow during the <br />snowmelt-runoff season, and slightly increased streamflow <br />during the winter along the main stems of the Colorado and <br />Gunnison Rivers. <br />Annual step-trend analysis indicated decreases in <br />streamflow in the Grand region. The Alva B. Adams Tunnel/ <br />Lake Granby export, which is the largest depletion in the <br />entire Upper Colorado River Basin, was the probable cause <br />of changes in streamflow and dissolved-solids concentration <br />at site 5 (Colorado River near Glenwood Springs, Colo.) and <br />changes in streamflow and dissolved-solids load at site 10 <br />(Colorado River near Cameo, Colo.). The filling of Blue <br />Mesa Reservoir decreased the monthly variability of stream- <br />flow, dissolved-solids concentration, and dissolved-solids <br />load in the Gunnison River and may have contributed to <br />decreasing annual monotonic trends in concentration and <br />load. Significant decreases in dissolved-solids concentration <br />and load also were detected in the Eagle River basin. <br />Dissolved-solids load, mainly dissolved sodium and chloride, <br />increased in the Dolores River basin. Annual step trends at <br />the most downstream site in the Grand Region (site 21, Colo- <br />32 Characteristics and Trends of Streamflow and Dissolved Solids in the Colorado River Basin
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.