My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7208
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:38:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7208
Author
Lyons, J.
Title
Green River Channel Characteristics Below Flaming Gorge.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Co.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7 <br />A step-backwater computer program (USBR, [7]) was used to compute the water <br />surface elevation profile for the Dinosaur Quarry and Ouray Refuge, and <br />Willow Creek sites for o f di5_c a including the computed effective <br />flow. <br />The effective flows computed for these sites did not approximate bankfull flow <br />(the discharge where flow just begins to leave the main channel and occupy the <br />flood plain) as defined by the cross section information collected in 1986 <br />t e bankfull flow redicted the com ter simulat' ns a eede <br />c ive 1 bu was less t an the ma imum flow given in the <br />the cal ted of efow <br />ranges above for each si e. <br />In the hydraulic computations performed using the step-backwater program, a <br />roughness n value was selected for use in computing water surface profiles <br />through a reach of channel. At the Quarry site, seven transects spaced over <br />4,260 feet were measured at a discharge of 5,400 ft3/s. At the Refuge site, <br />seven transects were measured in 4,840 feet of channel at a discharge of <br />9,940 ft3/s. At the site below Willow Creek, three transects spaced over <br />2,740 feet of channel were measured at a discharge of 5,230 ft3/s. <br />Calibrated roughness n values for the channel and overbank portions of each <br />transect were derived by adjusting these roughness values to obtain a computed <br />water surface profile that closely matched the measured water surface profile <br />through each reach. These calibrated values were used to compute the water sur- <br />face profiles in the study reach for the range of flows of interest. <br />Application of these calibrated roughness values to larger discharges assumes <br />that no roughness changes occur over the range of flows of interest. Also, the <br />channel measurements used in this analysis describe the Green River channel <br />following the high flow years of 1983, 1984, and 1986. These conditions may not <br />represent average channel conditions for the entire postreservoir period used <br />in calculating the effective flow. <br />Mean Annual Sand Load <br />The sand-load discharge rating curves (figures 10, 12-15) were used with flow <br />duration data from the gauges near Jensen, Utah, and at Green River, Utah, for <br />1965-1987. For the Quarry site and Refuge site, the mean annual sand-load <br />discharge for this period is 1,480,000 tons/year (table 1). These estimates <br />are based upon the Jensen gauge mean daily flow data and the suspended sand <br />load rating curve developed from the entire gauge history. <br />For the site downstream of Willow Creek, the mean annual sand load is <br />2,910,000 tons/year (table 2). The adjusted (see above for adjustment details) <br />mean daily flows from the Green River, Utah, gauge were used in this estimate. <br />The suspended sand-load rating curve for the Ouray gauge was used in <br />conjunction with the adjusted discharges. <br />At Green River, Utah, the mean annual sand load is 3,090,000 tons/year <br />(table 3). This estimate is based upon the mean daily flow record from the <br />Green River, Utah, gauge and the suspended sand-load rating curve developed <br />for this gauge using the entire gauged history; For the Duchesne River, <br />sediment rating curve developed for the Geological Survey gauge near Randlett <br />(figure 14) was used along with the mean daily flow record from this gauge
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.