Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br />A step-backwater computer program (USBR, [7]) was used to compute the water <br />surface elevation profile for the Dinosaur Quarry and Ouray Refuge, and <br />Willow Creek sites for o f di5_c a including the computed effective <br />flow. <br />The effective flows computed for these sites did not approximate bankfull flow <br />(the discharge where flow just begins to leave the main channel and occupy the <br />flood plain) as defined by the cross section information collected in 1986 <br />t e bankfull flow redicted the com ter simulat' ns a eede <br />c ive 1 bu was less t an the ma imum flow given in the <br />the cal ted of efow <br />ranges above for each si e. <br />In the hydraulic computations performed using the step-backwater program, a <br />roughness n value was selected for use in computing water surface profiles <br />through a reach of channel. At the Quarry site, seven transects spaced over <br />4,260 feet were measured at a discharge of 5,400 ft3/s. At the Refuge site, <br />seven transects were measured in 4,840 feet of channel at a discharge of <br />9,940 ft3/s. At the site below Willow Creek, three transects spaced over <br />2,740 feet of channel were measured at a discharge of 5,230 ft3/s. <br />Calibrated roughness n values for the channel and overbank portions of each <br />transect were derived by adjusting these roughness values to obtain a computed <br />water surface profile that closely matched the measured water surface profile <br />through each reach. These calibrated values were used to compute the water sur- <br />face profiles in the study reach for the range of flows of interest. <br />Application of these calibrated roughness values to larger discharges assumes <br />that no roughness changes occur over the range of flows of interest. Also, the <br />channel measurements used in this analysis describe the Green River channel <br />following the high flow years of 1983, 1984, and 1986. These conditions may not <br />represent average channel conditions for the entire postreservoir period used <br />in calculating the effective flow. <br />Mean Annual Sand Load <br />The sand-load discharge rating curves (figures 10, 12-15) were used with flow <br />duration data from the gauges near Jensen, Utah, and at Green River, Utah, for <br />1965-1987. For the Quarry site and Refuge site, the mean annual sand-load <br />discharge for this period is 1,480,000 tons/year (table 1). These estimates <br />are based upon the Jensen gauge mean daily flow data and the suspended sand <br />load rating curve developed from the entire gauge history. <br />For the site downstream of Willow Creek, the mean annual sand load is <br />2,910,000 tons/year (table 2). The adjusted (see above for adjustment details) <br />mean daily flows from the Green River, Utah, gauge were used in this estimate. <br />The suspended sand-load rating curve for the Ouray gauge was used in <br />conjunction with the adjusted discharges. <br />At Green River, Utah, the mean annual sand load is 3,090,000 tons/year <br />(table 3). This estimate is based upon the mean daily flow record from the <br />Green River, Utah, gauge and the suspended sand-load rating curve developed <br />for this gauge using the entire gauged history; For the Duchesne River, <br />sediment rating curve developed for the Geological Survey gauge near Randlett <br />(figure 14) was used along with the mean daily flow record from this gauge