My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7924
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7924
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:38:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7924
Author
Loar, J. M. and M. J. Sale.
Title
Analysis of Environmental Issues Related to Small-Scale Hydroelectric Development, V. Instream Flow Needs for Fishery Resources.
USFW Year
1981.
USFW - Doc Type
TM-7861, (contract no. W-7405-eng-26),
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6 <br />IFG, the Incremental Methodology (Section 2.8) was developed (Bovee <br />and Cochnauer 1977; Bovee and Milhous 1978; Stalnaker 1978, 1979b; <br />Trihey 1979; Wegner 1979). <br />The use of comparative field studies to evaluate various <br />fisheries methods is a recent development in the West (R. Giger <br />personal communication). These studies were funded in 12 western <br />states as part of the Western Water Allocation Project. This <br />comparative approach represents a logical step in the sequence of <br />events that will hopefully lead to insights on the applicability of <br />the various methods. Although many gaps still exist in our knowledge <br />of the relationship between stream flow and fish production, these <br />shortcomings should not prevent users from applying or modifying <br />existing methods. The successful development of adequate methods for <br />assessing instream flow needs will require applications on a wide <br />range of watersheds throughout the country. Although no consensus <br />has yet been reached regarding the "best" method to use in a given <br />situation, additional information acquired from continued application <br />in the field will eventually lead to a better understanding of the <br />applicability of the various methods. <br />1.1.2 Development in the East <br />Unlike in the West where instream flow methods evolved over the <br />past 20 years in response to the growing demand for limited water <br />supplies, in the East instream flow needs are just beginning to <br />develop as an issue. With the exception of the method developed by <br />Robinson (1969) for the Connecticut River basin, no formal methods to <br />assess instream flow needs have been documented from the eastern <br />United States until recently (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1981). <br />Eastern initiatives in formulating instream flow policies were largely <br />in response to an increase in the development of small hydropower <br />resources in the Northeast. Because water is more abundant in the <br />East than in the West, conflicts to date have been highly localized. <br />Moreover, water law in most states east of the Mississippi River is
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.