Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) <br />Section Page <br />2.8 IFG Incremental Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 <br />2.9 Summary of Available Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 <br />3. CRITICAL EVALUATION OF EXISTING METHODS FOR INSTREAM <br />FLOW ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 <br />3.1 Implicit Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 <br /> 3.1.1 Hydraulics and Channel Morphology . . . . . . . 52 <br /> 3.1.2 Biological Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 <br />3.2 Data Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 <br /> 3.2.1 Hydrologic Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 <br /> 3.2.2 Transect Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 <br /> 3.2.3 Habitat Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 <br />3.3 Costs of Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 <br /> 3.3.1 Discharge Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 <br /> 3.3.2 Single-Transect, Hydraulic Rating <br /> Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 <br /> 3.3.3 Habitat Modeling Approaches . . . . . . . . . . 71 <br />3.4 Decision-Making Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 <br />4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 <br />4.1 General Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 <br />4.2 Guidelines for Assessing Instream Flow Needs <br />Related to Fishery Resources at Small-Scale <br />Hydropower Sites 78 <br />4.2.1 Levels of Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 <br />4.2.2 Criteria for Selecting Among Levels . . . . . . 83 <br />4.2.3 Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 <br />4.3 Planning for Instream Flow Assessments . . . . . . . 90 <br />5. LITERATURE CITED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 <br />M <br /> <br /> <br />s <br /> <br />0 <br />x