My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9455
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9455
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:37:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9455
Author
Lyons, J. K., M. J. Pucherelli and R. C. Clark.
Title
Sediment Transport and Channel Characteristics of a Sand-Bed portion of the Green River Below Flaming Gorge Dam, Utah, U.S.A.
USFW Year
1992.
USFW - Doc Type
R-92-08,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(3 293 000 tonnes per year for 1975-86) satisfies the difference computed for the bed-material <br />load estimates for sites B and C. <br />Table 5. - Summary of mean annual sand load of the Green River and <br />major tributary streams. <br />Mainstem Mean annual Mean annual <br />site Tributary Period Q, m3/s %, tonnes/y <br />A 1965-87 129.9 1 343 000 <br />B 1965-87 129.9 1343 000 <br />Duchesne 1965-87 18.1 42 000 <br />white 1975-86 23.9 925 000 <br />C 1965-87 183.4 2 640 000 <br />Price 1965-87 4.5 <br />Gauge 09315000 1965-87 181.5 2 803 000 <br />Note: Sand load data is not available for the Price River. <br />At gauge 09315000, the mean annual bed-material load was about 6 percent larger than the <br />load computed for site C. The main tributary in the intervening reach, the Price River, is <br />gauged about 56 kilometers upstream of its confluence with the Green River. Inadequate gauge <br />records prevented the calculation of average annual sand load from the Price River. The mean <br />annual discharge of the Price River is about 2 percent of the flow of the Green and is not likely a <br />major contributor to the total sand load of the Green River. <br />On average for 1965-1987, the bed-material load of the Green River at gauge 09261000 was <br />nearly 50 percent of the river's bed-material load at gauge 09315000. Suspended sand load in <br />the White and Duchesne Rivers account for about two-thirds of this difference, 967 000 tonnes <br />per year. Assuming a 10-percent bedload correction factor for the White River satisfied the <br />difference. The mass balance of bed-material loads, calculated from the long-term gauge <br />histories of the Green River at intermediate sampling locations, indicated that the Green River <br />was transporting just the sand load that was delivered to it throughout, this reach during <br />1965-1987. <br />Discharge Patterns <br />Andrews (1986) reported no changes in mean annual flow at the two mainstem Green River <br />gauges 09261000 and 09315000 following closure of Flaming Gorge. However, he found changes <br />in the duration of flow pattern of the Green River, reporting that the magnitude of flows that <br />occur less than 10 percent of the time decreased significantly after regulation. <br />Figure 4 contains the annual peak flows for gauge 09261000 for the period covered by the aerial <br />photography for study reach 1. The peak recorded in 1984, 1133 cubic meters per second, is the <br />largest reported for the entire gauge history. These data were separated into three periods, <br />1953-64, 1965-78, and 1979-86, corresponding to the photographic intervals. An analysis of <br />covariance showed no statistically significant difference (a = 0.05) in the means of the annual <br />peak flows for these intervals. A similar analysis of the annual peak flow data for gauge <br />09315000 (fig. 5) indicated no statistically significant differences in the means of these data <br />The peak flows at this gauge were separated into three periods: 1953-74, 1975-81, and <br />1982-87, based upon the dates of aerial photography for reach 2. <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.