Laserfiche WebLink
UUIUr'duu nivtr <br />The upper Colorado River, above the study area, was similar to the <br />Gunnison in appearance and in species of fish found. The major change in <br />fish species probably occurs near the town of Rifle, Colorado. This is pri- <br />marily due to changes in river characteristics and habitat type. Man's <br />activity are probably not directly responsible for these changes until the <br />river enters the area of study. Few fish studies have been done on the <br />Colorado River in the area of this study, thus there is little historic <br />fishery information available for comparison. The major reason for this <br />void in historic data was the lack of interest in non-trout waters. Only <br />recently have people become interested in non-game species of fish. <br />As mentioned previously, the Colorado River was divided into just two <br />major sections. Data from previous studies indicated that certain areas <br />were important to the native endangered species of fish under study. Data <br />collected by the author in a previous study with the Colorado Division of <br />Wildlife, Kidd (1974) and data collected by N.F.R.I. in 1976, and Holden <br />(1974), is presented for comparison with the Gunnison data (Table 3), as <br />indexes of population numbers or actual relative abundance for all species <br />shown. A reason for exercising caution when interpreting these data is <br />that the sampling gear and major efforts were directed for collection of <br />these first four noted endemic species and not for other species. Thus no <br />randomization or systematic sampling was employed. <br />Backwater areas seem to be key areas for squawfish and razorback suckers. <br />Humpback chubs were found in a canyon area with de p holes. Estimates of <br />the physical size of backwater areas,,where these fish were found are pre- <br />sented in Table 4. A permanent type of connection to the main river seemed <br />(16) <br />