Laserfiche WebLink
that razorback suckers may move to spawning areas within the 15-mile reach, <br />then--perhaps like Colorado squawfish--return to feeding and resting areas of <br />relatively small size for the remainder of the year. <br />The two ripe razorback suckers captured in spring 1986 were caught in a <br />gravel-pit pond connected to the river. One was a female captured on 3 <br />June; she had very ripe eggs that could be expressed when slight external <br />pressure was applied. The other was a male captured eight days later, about <br />30 m from the site of the female; he had thin milt expressable with slight <br />pressure. Again, no larval or YOY razorbacks from our collections have as <br />yet been identified as such. <br />Habitat Use <br />Adult Colorado squawfish <br />Habitat use-by adult squawfish during 1986 and 1987 was determined by <br />measuring depth, velocity, substrate and temperature at the locations of <br />radio-tagged fish, as well as by visually categorizing the habitat type <br />(e.g. pool, eddy, riffle, etc.). In 1987, we also began monitoring water <br />clarity in the 15-mile reach. <br />Habitat Type <br />During runoff in spring, riverside gravel-pit ponds became flooded and <br />accessible to fish from the river; many squawfish moved into these zero- <br />velocity, warm habitats then (Fig. 6). By early July, squawfish had moved <br />from these ponds as the river receded and the ponds once again became <br />isolated from the river. During July-November, use of backwaters greatly <br />diminished and pools and runs were more often used; a few fish were found in <br />riffles and rapids. During November-December squawfish moved to wintering <br />22