My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7228
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:31:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7228
Author
Kaeding, L. R. and D. B. Osmundson.
Title
Biologically Defensible Flow Recommendations for the Maintenance and Enhancement of Colorado Squawfish Habitat in the '15-Mile' Reach of the Upper Colorado River During July, August and September.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
space available to the fish. This is because other environmental variables--the <br />availability of food or of hiding places away from predators, for example--become <br />limiting factors on the fish population before the population reaches a size that is <br />limited by the availability of physical space. However, if the volume of physical space is <br />reduced because of reduction in river flow, there will be a point reached where the <br />available habitat volume is effectively filled by the fish, food availability becomes <br />inadequate or other structural or functional aspects of the habitat become limiting <br />factors and further reductions in volume therefore will have a direct, negative effect on <br />fish population size. <br />But how might flow recommendations to maintain or enhance important fish <br />populations be developed despite the prevailing scarcity of empirical relations between <br />discharge and the populations themselves? To begin, two critical concerns must be <br />addressed. First, an understanding of the important factors limiting the fish population <br />must be developed. If the important factors are related to flow, either directly or <br />indirectly, then the factor vs. flow relation would provide a good basis for developing a <br />flow recommendation. If the important limiting factors are not related to flow, there <br />remains a need to identify flow values required to sustain some level of population <br />because, as discussed earlier, as flow decreases there will be a point reached where <br />further flow reduction will reduce the carrying capacity of the river and thereby reduce <br />the maximum attainable population size. An extreme example of this might be a river <br />flowing at 10 ft3/sec but otherwise having suitable conditions for Colorado squawfish. <br />Such a river will not sustain a population of 100, 10-pound adult squawfish per mile, <br />although this might be an established population goal considered important to recovery. <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.