My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7228
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:31:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7228
Author
Kaeding, L. R. and D. B. Osmundson.
Title
Biologically Defensible Flow Recommendations for the Maintenance and Enhancement of Colorado Squawfish Habitat in the '15-Mile' Reach of the Upper Colorado River During July, August and September.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />Introduction <br />.................................................... 1 <br />A Strategy for Determining the Flow-habitat <br />Re <br />uire <br />t <br />f <br />h <br />q <br />men <br />s o <br />t <br />e Endangered Fishes ......... <br />Assessment of flow recommendations <br />the long-term <br />rocess 2 <br />5 <br />, <br />p <br />.............. <br />Flow-habitat Management Objectives for the 15-mile R <br />h <br />eac <br />................. <br />Ph <br />i <br />l h 6 <br />ys <br />ca <br />abitat ........................ . . . . <br />............... <br />T 7 <br />emperature ............................ . . . . <br />Introduced fishes <br />............... 10 <br />....................... . . . . . . . . <br />.............. <br />Water clarity ........ 11 <br />.................. <br />Agricultural pesticides 11 <br />.......................... <br />Angling mortality ..... 12 <br />........................................ 12 <br />Approaches for Achieving Flow-habitat <br />Management Objectives for the 15-mile Reach <br />........ . . . . . . . <br />............ <br />Ph <br />si <br />l h <br />bi 13 <br />y <br />ca <br />a <br />tat ........................ . . . . . . . . <br />.............. <br />T 13 <br />emperature .......................... . . . . . . . <br />.............. <br />Introduced fishe 16 <br />s ........................ . . . . . . . . <br />. <br />............ <br />Wate <br />l <br />i 17 <br />r c <br />ar <br />ty .......................... . . <br />. <br />Agricultural pesticides <br />. • . . . .... • • 18 <br />........................... <br />Angling mortality .... 18 <br />......................................... 19 <br />Flow-management Recommendation for the 15-mile Reach .............. 19 <br />.... <br />Importance to Colorado squawfish of implementing the flow recommendation . 21 <br />Comparison of the flow recommendation to historic flows ............. 25 <br />.. <br />Com <br />i <br />f <br />h <br />fl <br />par <br />son o <br />t <br />e <br />ow recommendation to natural flows ............ 27 <br />.... <br />Hypotheses to be tested as part of the long-term assessment effort ......... 28 <br />Problems with Developing and <br />Implementing the Flow Recommendation <br />......... <br />W <br />t <br />? 29 <br />a <br />er storage on the descending limit of the hydrograph _ <br />Flow recommendations that differ from "natural" conditions 29 <br />29 <br />Concer <br />f <br />h <br />i <br />n <br />or ot <br />er <br />mportant habitats ............................... 30 <br />Development of Flow Recommendations <br />for the Re <br />i <br />i <br />M <br />h <br />ma <br />n <br />ng <br />ont <br />s .......................................... 31 <br />Summary ...... <br />................................................ 33
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.