Laserfiche WebLink
involving physical habitat limitations, fishery management practices, <br />reservoir operations, and behavioral and physiological responses of the <br />trout to the tailwater environment. <br />Habitat Conditions as Functions of Lifestage and River Discharge <br />Physical habitat simulation (PHABSIM) models were employed to <br />evaluate seasonal habitat conditions. Microhabitat electivity data for <br />rainbow and cutthroat trout, juveniles and adults, were collected during <br />summer and winter at different levels of discharge. These data were then <br />integrated with physical models of three winter habitat types located at <br />the Tailrace, Pipe Creek, and Indian Crossing. The resulting model <br />projections strongly suggested habitat for trout less than 250 mm (10 <br />inches) TL was relatively scarce in winter, at least at the three habitat <br />simulation stations. Conditions were apparently not limiting for either <br />adult or juvenile trout in summer or for the adult life stage in winter. <br />Results and observations of other study elements appeared to verify the <br />PHABSIM projections. <br />In general, there appeared to be more usable winter habitat for <br />trout at lower levels of discharge. The habitat simulation stations at <br />Pipe Creek and Indian Crossing were, together, probably the most <br />representative of the tailwater's winter habitats. The output from these <br />two stations produced an inverse relationship between total weighted <br />usable area and discharge. Overall winter habitat was greater at Pipe <br />Creek and Tailrace than at Indian Crossing. There was a positive <br />relationship between weighted usable area and discharge at Tailrace. <br />These model projections were corroborated by the substantially higher tag <br />return rates (reflecting higher winter survival) for trout tagged prior <br />to winter at and near the tailrace. <br />-4-