My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9510
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9510
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:28:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9510
Author
Jones, A. T.
Title
A Cross Section of Grand Canyon Archeology
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Excavations at Five Sites Along the Colorado River.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />u <br /> <br />an expl anation sometimes offered for' the abandonment of the canyon by <br />the Ana sazi . Other researchers (Madsen 1975) support a later date, <br />approximately A.D. 1300, for the movement. Thi s controversy suggested <br />some questi ons. Do the dates obtained from as soci ated contexts <br />corroborate the current chronology with its gaps in occupations? <br />Judging from the apparent depth of the deposits, the sites were occupied <br />numerouS times. Are preceramic components present? No habitation sites <br />of the salile age as the Late Archa ic spl i t.,twi g fi gurines have been found <br />below the rims. <br />The solution to historical problems requires a firm chronology so <br />that other questions may be tackled with confidence. Using a diachronic <br />approach, change through time can be examined. For exampl e, as cul tural <br />affil i ati on of the si tes changed, woul d the economic ori entati on have <br />changed? The vari ed materi al preserved in shel tered si tes gives a more <br />complete picture of the types of resources util i zed, the types of tool s <br />used .to process them and, hence, the entire behavioral process from <br />collecting to consumption to discard. Given a sufficiently large <br />sample, we hoped to determine what proportion of the diet was <br />contributed by products from hunting, gathering or agriculture, and in <br />what seasons the sites were occupied. Resources not locally available <br />indicate trade or movement from another area, either by migration or <br />seasonal movement. We were interested in detennining the nature of the <br />relationship between specific groups and the size of the interaction <br />sphere. Were the people self.,sufficient or did they rely on other <br />groups for items important to their existence? <br />The subsi stence studi es hel ped detennine whi ch faunal and floral <br />products were used by man, and which were introduced by noncultural <br />agenci es. Wi th these data and a good chronology, our knowl edge of <br />paleoenvironmental conditions was augmented. We wished to discover <br />how the environment changed through time, and in turn how thi s <br />affected man's behavior and his use of the resources in thi s marginal <br />environment. Did fluctuations in rainfall and temperatures precipitate <br />different adaptive strategies, including abandonment between A.D. 1150 <br />and A. D. 1300? <br />The various cl asses of data to be presented hel ped answer the above <br />questions. The orientation is a good example of using a management <br /> <br />: <br />j <br /> <br />"1 <br />.d <br /> <br />:-f <br /> <br />, I <br />] <br />..'i <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />f"--ll <br />i: <br />i..J <br /> <br />w <br /> <br />Fj", <br />L,. <br />k <br /> <br />~ j <br />l.J <br /> <br />! j <br />ill <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.