My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8172
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8172
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:26:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8172
Author
Jacobi, G. Z., J. E. Sublette, S. J. Herrmann, D. E. Cowley and M. D. Hatch.
Title
Final Report
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Investigations of an Index of Biotic Integrity in New Mexico.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
391
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Objectives 4 and 5. <br />Physical and chemical sampling has been completed for 154 sample sites and most of the data <br />from these investigations have been entered into a database. Where field collection records were <br />not available, data was obtained from the New Mexico Surface Water Quality Bureau STORET <br />database for New Mexico and incorporated into our master database. Twenty-five chemical, <br />physical and climate variables were used to delineate general boundaries for aquatic ecoregions <br />in New Mexico. The purpose of this is to facilitate the study of fish and benthic <br />macroinvertebrate distributions within regions where the composition of the biotic communities <br />might be expected to be similar. Four aquatic ecoregions have been identified that intersect <br />major drainage boundaries and physiographic provinces. This indicates an underlying similarity <br />among sites that is more related to elevation and growing season length rather than to <br />physiography, surface or subsurface geology. Aquatic Ecoregion 1 includes sites above about <br />2135 m (7000 ft) in at least five major drainage basins in the state. Within Aquatic Ecoregion 1, <br />there are two subgroups of sites which differ mauily'in substrate composition; one group, <br />generally at higher elevation, has a higher percentage of boulder substrate and lower percentages <br />of gravel and sand than does the other group. Aquatic Ecoregion 2 includes sites from about <br />1675 m (5500 ft) elevation up to about 2135 m. These sites differ from the higher elevation sites <br />of Aquatic Ecoregion 1 by having a significantly higher percentage of silt substrate, higher <br />substrate embeddedness, longer growing season length, and greater watershed area. Aquatic <br />Ecoregion 3 represents sites from about the. 180 frost free isoline, located variously between <br />about 1340 m and 1370 m (about 4400 ft and 4500 ft) elevation up to about 1675 m. Aquatic <br />Ecoregion 4 includes sites with a growing season length greater than 180 frost free days. In New <br />Mexico, this is restricted to the downstream ends of the Rio Grande, Pecos, Canadian, Mimbres, <br />Tularosa, and Gila drainages. The multivariate analyses used to define the aquatic ecoregions <br />were also useful for identifying "outlier" sites, i.e., sites that were very different from other sites <br />near them. A manuscript of these findings is appended to this report (Appendix 3). The co- <br />authors of this report intend to publish these findings in a peer reviewed scientific journal. <br />Objective 6. <br />The effects of environmental stressors on fishes have traditionally been assessed in New Mexico <br />at low levels of biological organization. Retrospective assessments of stress on aquatic <br />communities have had two foci. First, stress assessment has been oriented toward the health of <br />individual fish and it has focused on measuring physiological functions of individual fish, rates <br />of deformities or disease, condition, incidence of parasitism, and tolerance to specific <br />contaminants. The second perspective for assessment of stress in fish has been focused on site- <br />specific trends in the abundance, growth rate, and distribution of populations. At the community <br />level, assessment has involved simple comparisons of taxonomic richness or indices of diversity <br />estimated for different points in time. Our efforts are directed toward extending site-specific <br />assessment to a regional framework. To accomplish this, we need to understand how benthic <br />macroinvertebrate, chironomid and fish faunal assemblages are structured by underlying <br />physical, chemical, and climatic features of their environment prior to large-scale impacts by <br />humans. The report in Appendix 2 (and to a lesser degree, the report in Appendix 1) <br />(n
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.