Laserfiche WebLink
Box 2. Matrix permutation test results comparing matrices of dimes s between sites <br />based on environmental data (E), fish data (F), chlronomid data (C), and benthie <br />macroinvertebrate data (M). <br />Comparison Number of Permutations Kendall-s Tau P-value <br />M vs 8 10,000 -0.02 0.204 <br />F va 8 10,000 0.17 0.019• <br />C vs 8 10,000 -0.01 0.724 <br />M vs F 10,000 0.13 0.001* <br />M vs C 10,000 <br />0.10 0.084 <br />F va C 10,000 -0.12 0.753 <br />Notes: •?• denotes a statistical) significant <br />environmental data were based on scares an 6 varimcorrelation. ax--rot ted envitrotmentaltfactorsites s. for <br />Distances between sites for fish data, for chironomid data, and for benthic <br />macroinvertabrate data were based on presence/absence. <br />Im- <br />" I" uuduun =5 (Box j) ]plated that <br />dissimilarity between sites was significantly <br />correlated (P=0.019) when fish data and <br />environmental data were compared and <br />when fish data and benthic <br />macroinvertebrate data were compared <br />(P=0.001). In contrast, no significant <br />association (P>0.1) was found between <br />chironomid data and environmental data or <br />between fish data, benthic <br />macroinvertebrate data, and chironomid <br />data. Thus, there was a comparable pattern <br />in dissimilarity. between sites with respect to <br />(1) environmental data and fish <br />presence/absence data and (2) fish species <br />and benthic macroinvertebrate taxa. <br />Taxonomic Associations <br />Chironomids <br />Species associations for chironomids were <br />obtained by cluster analysis on <br />prmnce/absence data (Figure 12a). Three <br />broad clusters were identified, two of which <br />had a significant number of meaningful <br />subdivisions. Cluster 1 was composed of <br />widespread chironomid species. The <br />species occurring at the most sites (15) was <br />Cricotopus trifascia, followed by <br />Orthocladius mallochi (12 sites) and <br />Rheotanytarsus n.sp.1 (12 sites). Four <br />chironomid species in cluster 1 were found <br />at 10 sites, and the remainder of the species <br />in cluster 1 were found at 5 to 9 sites. <br />A second broad cluster is designated 2 on <br />Figure 12a. Six subgroups occur with <br />cluster 2 and these are labeled A-F (Figure <br />12a) and all of these subgroups shared <br />species to some degree with the most <br />diverse site in the upper Rio Grande <br />drainage, i.e., the Chama River above the <br />town of Chama. Recall that site had 76 <br />species of chironomids. Group A <br />represented chironomid species that <br />occurred in the Chama River at the wildlife <br />31 <br />14