Laserfiche WebLink
from a number of sites in the upper Rio <br />Grande drainage of New Mexico. <br />The objectives of the present study are: (1) <br />identify preferred data analysis methods by <br />analyzing a subset of data confined to the <br />upper Rio Grande drainage, (2) identify <br />aquatic ecoregions within the upper Rio <br />Grande drainage and (a) elucidate <br />. -environmental • factors-- that-characterize the <br />ecoregions, and (b) assess the utility of <br />aquatic ecoregion classification as opposed <br />to Hydrologic Units, (3) identify <br />chironomid, benthic macroinvertebrate, and <br />fish "faunal regions" and determine if they <br />are consistent with the aquatic ecoregions <br />identified with enviroi data, (4) <br />characterize associations of chironomid <br />species, benthic macroinvertebrate taxa, and <br />fish species, and (5) initiate a search for <br />summary statistics that may provide <br />important information about environmental <br />integrity and may warrant inchision in IBIS. <br />Methods <br />Study Area <br />The study area for this report included, <br />aquatic stream habitats within the upper Rio <br />Grande drainage of New Mexico. Three <br />drainage basins within the upper Rio <br />Grande drainage were studied, i.e., (1) the <br />mainstream Rio Grande and its tributaries <br />upstream from the Cbama River confluence, <br />(2) the Chama River drainage, and (3) the <br />Jemez River drainage. Habitats sampled <br />ranged from 5410' to 10520' in elevation. <br />The study area was bounded by the <br />Continental Divide on the west, the <br />Canadian and Pecos River drainages to the <br />east, and the New Mexico-Colorado border <br />on the north. The study area was bounded <br />on the south by the upper end of Cochiti <br />Lake on the Rio Grande and San Ysidro on <br />the Jemez River drainage. <br />Data CoUnfion <br />Field collection of floating chironomid <br />Pupal exuviae was'accomplished by dipping <br />a fine mesh hand net (280 micron mesh <br />netting) into the water where pupal exuviae <br />accumulated (e.g., eddy currents, behind <br />rocks, logs, and diversions). Water, <br />organic detritus, and floating pupal exuviae <br />flowed into the net as one edge was dipped <br />beneath the surface of the water. After the <br />net bad filled, the contents of the net were <br />emptied directly into a jar of 75% ethanol. <br />Collection was repeated until a large amount <br />of detritus and pupal exuviae were obtained. <br />Collection information was printed on a <br />label and included with the sample. <br />Pupal exuviae samples were sorted in the <br />laboratory by pouring aliquots of the sample <br />into a Petri dish and inspecting the dish for <br />exuviae using a dissecting microscope set at <br />12X magnification. Individual exuviae <br />were picked from the dish and placed into a <br />small vial. Up to 100 specimens of each <br />sample were slide-mounted to provide <br />analytical material and the remainder of the <br />sample was preserved as voucher specimens <br />for future studies. Generic keys given in <br />Coffman and Ferrington (1984) and <br />Wiederholm (1986) were used for <br />Chironomidae pupal exuviae identification. <br />Field collections of immature stages of <br />stoneflies (Plecoptera), mayflies <br />(Ephemeroptera), caddisflies (Trichoptera), <br />and otter orders of benthic <br />macroinvertebrates were accomplished by <br /> <br />2