Laserfiche WebLink
Introduction ...................................................................... 1 <br />Methods .......................................................................... 2 <br />Study area ............................................. <br />Data Collection ........ <br />Statistical Analyses ............................................ .................................. 2 <br />Defining Ecoregions with Environmental Data ........................... <br />Utility of Aquatic Ecoregions as Opposed to Hydrologic Units ............................ . <br />.... 5 <br />Site Similarity Based on Invertebrate Taxa (Chironomid and Benthic <br />Macroinvertebrate Faunal Regions) ........................... <br />Site Similarity Based on Fish Species (Fiat Faunal Regions) .................................. . <br />Associations of Benthic Macsooinvertebrate Tara and Chironomid species ...................... 6 <br />Fish Species Associations ..................................................... 7 <br />Species-Environment Relations ................................................................ 7 <br />Exploratory Analyses for IBI Development .................................................... 8 <br />Results ........................................................................... 8 <br />Aquatic Ecoregiom within the Upper Rio Grande Drainage of New Mexico ........................ 8 <br />Box 1. Varimax-muted environmental factors for 31 sites in the upper Rio Grande <br />drainage of New Mexico ...................................................................... 9 <br />Utility of Aquatic F.coregions as Opposed to Hydrologic Units <br />Cbironomid Faunal Regions <br />Benthic Macroinvertebrate Faunal Regions .......................... <br />Fish Faunal Regions ......................................................... .............. 13 <br />Congruence between Ecoregioes and Faunal Regions ............................................. 13 <br />Box 2. Matrix permutation test results comparing matrices of distances between sites <br />based on environmental data, fish data, dgronomid data, and bentb c <br />macroinvertebrate data ....................................................................... 14 <br />Taxonomic Associations ................................................. <br />Cbironomids ................................................................................. 14 <br />Box 3. Distribution of chimnomid subfamilies for species associations 2 and 3 15 <br />Benthic Macroinvertebrates .................................................................. 15 <br />Fish .......................................................... <br />Species-Environment Relations ................ <br />Fish ......................................................................................... 17 <br />Chironomids ................................................................................. 18 <br />Benthic Macroinvertebrates .................................................................. 18 <br />Preliminary IBI Statistics ......................................................................... 19 <br />Discussion <br />....................................... • ....................... 1 ...... 20 <br />Upper Rio Grande Aquatic Ecoregions ................................. <br />Faunal Regions ................................................................................... 21 <br />Similarity of Faunal Regions and Ecoregions ........................... <br />?S