My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9599
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:46:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9599
Author
Miller, W. J. and D. E. Rees.
Title
Annual Report - Colorado Squawfish Habitat Use and Movement During Summer Low Flow in the Yampa river Upstream of Cross Mountain Canyon.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />' Habitat use data for Colorado squawfish were obtained by tracking five radio tagged adult <br /> fish during July through October, 1996. In addition to the squawfish, five northern pipe and <br />' five channel catfish were also tagged and located on a bi-weekly basis. All fish were <br /> monitored from River Mile (RM) 77 upstream to RM 103. <br />' Colorado squawfish used pool habitat the majority of the time that they were observed in <br /> the field. Movement from one pool to another through riffles was documented, however, <br /> no fish remained in the riffles during an observation period. Colorado squawfish moved <br />' during the late evening to near midnight for what appeared to be feeding within the local <br /> habitat where they were first monitored on the 24 hour observations. No fish during <br /> those 24 hour observations was seen moving through a riffle section but moved actively <br />' within a longer pool or run habitat. During the course of the study one Colorado <br /> squawfish moved upstream approximately 7 miles. That same fish moved 6 '/2 milejs <br /> downstream to near the point of initial capture by the end of the study. This fish moved <br />' through numerous shallow riffles and one diversion structure during the lowest floes of <br /> the year. A second Colorado squawfish was noted to move 5 miles downstream and <br />' remain in that downstream location for the study period. <br /> Channel catfish used pool habitat primarily and run habitat secondarily. Most of those <br />' fish remained within the same river mile of contact but two had moved approximately 4 <br /> miles downstream at the end of the study in late October. <br />' Northern pike had less movement than any of the other species. They did show <br /> movement during 24 hour periods that were similar to Colorado squawfish with <br /> movement activity peaking after dusk and in late evening to midnight. They did move <br />' from a stationary location upstream and then back downstream to the location where first <br /> observed. Most of the northern pike stayed within the same river mile where the initial <br /> <br />' capture and tagging took place and did not move outside that area. Most movemen <br />were less than '/z mile but they did move from pool through a riffle to a pool during ts <br />the <br /> course of the study. <br />' Data collection for 1997 should continue as in 1996. Radio telemetry should be <br /> conducted every other week from late July until October. When possible, 24 hour <br /> observations should be made once per month on each Colorado squawfish. <br /> Habitat use information should be based on ground contacted fish locations. Contacts by <br />' air overflights should be used for general river location to assist ground crews in locating <br /> implanted fish. Ground crews were able to triangulate locations of implanted fish to <br /> verify actual river locations. In some instances the actual locations differed by sev oral <br />' miles from the location reported by air surveys. The large difference, with no apparent <br /> pattern in occurrence, indicate that air contacts without ground truthing cannot be t ised to <br /> <br />' categorize habitat used by the fish. <br /> Yampa River Radio Telemetry Report Page v <br /> Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. January 123, 1997 <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.