My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8091
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8091
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:45:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8091
Author
Miller, W. H., et al.
Title
White River Fishes Study
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Habitat Preferences of all Fish Species <br />This section presents data obtained from the enumeration of fishes <br />collected in habitat types (Figure 7). Habitat preference is inferred <br />from conditions measured at point of capture. Caution should be used <br />when interpreting the information presented on number of fishes col- <br />lected in a given habitat type using all gear types in all strata. <br />These habitat types are not uniformly represented in all strata. How- <br />ever, all habitat types within a station were sampled using at least one <br />gear type. More complete analysis of these data will be made later <br />using a number of variables including stratum, habitat type, water <br />depth, water velocity and substrate type. <br />Backwaters generally contained more fish than any other habitat, <br />primarily the small species of minnows (e.g., red shiner and fathead <br />minnow), young and juveniles of the larger species (e.g., Colorado <br />squawfish, flannelmouth sucker and Gila). Adults of species other than <br />the small, cyprinids were uncommon. <br />Eddies frequently contained the greatest number of adults of the <br />larger species and occasionally contained large numbers of young red <br />shiners, carp, roundtail chub and channel catfish. <br />Collections made in shoreline habitat also contained high numbers <br />of the larger species as well as red shiners. Adult bluehead suckers, <br />flannelmouth suckers, Colorado squawfish and Gila spp. were collected <br />from this habitat type in some or all strata. <br />No razorback suckers were collected in this study, nor have they <br />been recorded from the White River in recent times (Lanigan and Berry <br />1981). <br />Fishes of the genus Gila were collected in all strata during <br />standardized sampling. Stratum V contained the largest number of Gila <br />spp. One suspected humpback chub was collected from stratum Z at the <br />Mountain Fuel Bridge; however, this specimen was not preserved and its <br />identification has not been confirmed. Analysis of measurements taken <br />from other Gila spp. indicated all other Gila spp. collected were round- <br />tail chubs.- <br />The numbers of fish species found in a stratum generally reflects <br />the diversity of habitats or the environmental conditions in that <br />stratum. Strata X and V contained the largest numbers of fish species <br />with 12 and 13, respectively (Figure 8) (genus Gila included as one <br />species). Stratum W contained the lowest number of species with nine, <br />and strata Y and Z each contained 10 species. Fish species diversity <br />was obtained for each strata by calculating the Shannon-Weaver diversity <br />index (Green 1979). (This index was highest for strata X, V and W) <br />0.75, 0.64 and 0.63) and lowest for strata Y and Z) (0.56 and 0.45). <br />These indices appear to be directly proportional to stream gradient. <br />24.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.