Laserfiche WebLink
August 2000 CRWCD * Ymqu Ruer Rom Small Rm wo- Study - Phase 2 Report * Page ? 8 <br />' The Recovery Program provides a means of implementing a broad range of measures for protection <br />and recovery of the endangered fish species in the Upper Colorado River Basin, taking into <br />consideration existing and future water development. The USFWS, in conjunction with the CRWCD, <br />' Yampa River Basin Partnership, Federal and State agencies, and water users are in the process of <br />developing a Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) for the Yampa River Basin. The PBO will <br />describe water management and fish management strategies for recovery of the endangered fish <br />species. Several small reservoir sites could potentially supplement flow to the Yampa River and are <br />' under consideration as part of the water management strategy currently being evaluated. <br />2.2 PHASE 1 SUMMARY <br />Phase 1 of the small reservoir study was conducted to identify and evaluate small reservoir <br />opportunities in the Yampa River basin. Small storage was defined as 200 to 2,000 ac-ft. Local water. <br />' users and Division 6 staff were consulted and USGS topographic maps were reviewed for potential <br />locations. The specific objectives of the project were: <br />' • To identify small reservoir sites in the Yampa River basin that can satisfy existing and <br />long-term water supply needs. <br />• To identify projects that may be feasible based on local water demands and water <br />availability. <br />• To identify a recommended project, or projects, that wan-ant further examination of <br />t geotechnical conditions, recreational opportunities, water demands, and costs. <br />During Phase 1, a two-stage screening process was utilized to identify the project(s) that demonstrated <br />t the best potential to provide water storage for short- and long-term agricultural needs. The <br />preliminary screening assessed whether a tributary watershed had existing irrigated agriculture or the <br />potential for future irrigated agriculture (including the possibility of historic irrigation being <br />' reactivated); sufficient water yield; and cultural/political concerns. The preliminary screening process <br />eliminated 28 streams based on lack of irrigated agriculture, inadequate hydrology and/or <br />cultural/political considerations. <br />' Following the preliminary screening, 50 individual tributary streams with small storage opportunities <br /> were identified. These tributary watersheds contained 106 potential individual sites. Several of the <br /> sites were existing structures that could potentially be enlarged. In addition, several locations had <br />' been previously identified in prior studies and/or have conditional storage rights. In the past, some <br /> of these locations had been considered as much larger projects (greater than 10,000 ac-ft). These sites <br /> were included in this study because it might be feasible to construct smaller reservoirs in these <br /> locations. <br /> A more detailed screening process evaluated the 106 potential sites. The criteria evaluated included <br /> water demand, estimated inflow hydrology, environmental/land-use flaws, recreational potential, and <br />' the potential of the reservoir to deliver sufficient water to meet demand. Project costs were not <br /> developed or used as evaluation criteria. Detailed hydrologic and water rights/administration <br /> evaluations were not conducted. <br /> <br /> Twenty-four potential sites remained after the more detailed screening process. Table 1, Sumrwy of <br /> Potential Sites Fran Phase 1 that Warrant Further Ca uideration, identifies the 24 sites and provides the <br />' rationale for retaining these sites. Eighteen of the potential sites readily meet the storage criteria of <br /> 200 - 2,000 ac-ft. The Morrison Creek #1, Rampart, Thornburgh, and Pot Hook sites were also <br /> included as potential sites, although these sites have a much greater storage capacity than 2,000 ac-ft. <br />' Consideration of smaller capacity reservoirs at these sites is appropriate due to current economic <br /> <br />' Wnvr10531JV 2 Rq- Montgomery Watson * P.O Box 774018 • Ste rdw Springs Colorado 80477 *(970)879-6260 <br />OaiJO VOH