My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7823
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7823
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:44:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7823
Author
Miller, W. H., et al.
Title
Colorado River Fishery Project, Part II, Final Report, Field Investigations.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
River stage was an important factor in determining sampling effi- <br />ciency. Field teams had little success in collecting fish during early <br />prerunoff with all gear types, especially with passive gear. Because <br />passive entangling nets (gill and trammel) rely upon fish to be active <br />and moving, it was reasonable to attribute the low catch rates to cold <br />water temperatures, which cause fishes to be inactive. Electrofishing <br />and seining (active gear) were most successful during prerunoff. <br />Effectiveness in catching fish during runoff was complicated by high, <br />turbulent water conditions. Seining during runoff was difficult and <br />sometimes impossible. Trammel and gill nets during runoff were exclu- <br />sively used in eddies with only limited success. <br />Habitat preferences of all fish species <br />This section presents data obtained from the enumeration of fishes <br />collected in five habitat types. Habitat preference is inferred from <br />conditions measured at point of capture. Extreme caution should be used <br />when interpreting the information presented on number of fishes collected <br />for the various habitats since these data represent the total number of <br />fishes collected in a given habitat type using all gear types. These <br />habitat types are not uniformly represented in all strata. However, all <br />habitat types within an intensive reach were sampled using at least one <br />gear type. More complete analysis of these data will be made later,. <br />using a number of variables including stratum, habitat type, water depth, <br />water velocity, and substrate type. <br />Backwaters generally contained more fish than any other habitat, <br />primarily the small species of minnows (e.g., red shiner and fathead <br />minnow) and young and juveniles of the larger species (e.g., Colorado <br />squawfish and flannelmouth sucker). Adults of species other than the <br />small cyprinids were uncommon. YOY Colorado squaw€ish and fathead <br />minnows showed a high preference for this type of habitat. Red shiners <br />coexisted with young Colorado squawfish but were ubiquitious in all other <br />five habitats sampled. <br />Eddies frequently contained the greatest number of adults of the <br />larger species, and occasionally contained large numbers of young red <br />shiners, carp, roundtail chubs, and channel catfish. Black bullheads <br />were also found in eddies. <br />Collections made in shoreline habitat also contained high numbers of <br />the larger species as well as red shiners. Adult bluehead suckers, <br />flannelmouth suckers, Colorado squawfish, and Gila spp. were collected <br />from this habitat type in most strata. <br />Flannelmouth suckers and red shiners were more numerous than other <br />species in runs. However, this reflects general abundance through <br />several habitats rather than a preference for runs, since run is a <br />relative descriptor. Channel catfish were also common in runs. <br />Riffles are limited in the Green River, occurring most frequently in <br />strata C and D. No riffle habitat was sampled in strata E and F. The <br />40 only species collected from riffles were red shiners, Gila spp., speckled <br />dace, flannelmouth suckers, and bluehead suckers. The latter three were <br />the most common species collected. <br />31
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.