My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7823
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7823
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:44:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7823
Author
Miller, W. H., et al.
Title
Colorado River Fishery Project, Part II, Final Report, Field Investigations.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
turbid, high in nutrients. Primary production is low, benthic <br />invertebrates dependent on substrate. Fish species composition was <br />variable but dominated by cyprinids, catostomids, and influenced by <br />introduced fish species. <br />Following Joseph et al. (1977), the Green River should be included <br />in the third subdivision. As indicated by Smith (1981), the habitat <br />for periphyton and benthos is limited by high discharge relative to <br />channel capacity. Fishes are, therefore, exposed historically to an <br />"unsteady" supply of food, swift current, and great seasonal fluctuation <br />in stream discharge. <br />High stress associated with life in the lower riverine zones <br />results in a lower productivity than occurs in upstream headwaters <br />of the Green. This is evidenced by a sharp species segregation which <br />represents a demarcation between the short growing season, but good <br />food conditions of headwaters versus the stressful discharge and poor <br />food conditions of life in the main channel. According to Smith (1981), <br />these factors may explain the development of longevity and large size <br />of endemic large river forms (such as the Colorado squawfish) in the <br />main channels of the Green River. <br />Because seasonal differences in discharge dominate the Green River <br />ecosystem, sampling schedules were designed to measure the different <br />conditions existing in the different river runoff stages. Discharge <br />records were obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey'(USGS) and utilized <br />• to construct discharge hydrographs for 1979-1981 (Figures 6 to 8). Pre-, <br />post-, and runoff periods for each year were delineated from inspection <br />of these hydrographs as follows: <br />Prerunoff Runoff Postrunoff <br />1979 1 /1 - 4/19 4/20 - 6/30 <br />(not sampled) (not sampled) 7/1 - 12/31 <br />1980 1 /1 - 4/19 4/20 - 6/30 7 /1 - 12 /31 <br />1981 1/1 - 4/29 4/30 -,6/14 6/15 - 12/31 <br /> (not sampled) <br />Runoff in 1979 and 1980 was similar both in duration and magnitude. <br />In 1981, however, runoff was less sharply defined and of much smaller <br />magnitude. <br />Physicochemical description of strata <br />As stated previously, various physicochemical parameters were <br />measured in order to characterize strata. Mean water temperatures <br />generally reflected the order in which strata were sampled (i.e., <br />B-A-F-E-D-C). Mean water temperatures for each stratum during runoff <br />were higher than during prerunoff but were much less variable, reflecting <br />both higher. stream discharge and less variability in air temperatures. <br />Lower discharges and increased summer air temperatures in the post- <br />runoff period resulted in more variable water temperatures. Mean <br />• water temperatures for all strata except C and D increased regularly <br />from prerunoff through postrunoff. Strata C. and D include Gray Canyon <br />and Desolation Canyon, respectively, and are deeper (Table 6, Figure 9) <br />21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.