Laserfiche WebLink
the first day included time periods A-1, B-1, and. C-2, then sampling on <br />• the second day would be done during periods A-2, B-2, and C-1. Sampling <br />on the third day included the same periods as sampled on the first day. <br />Data were recorded in the same manner as were other collections except <br />all Colorado squawfish were fin-clipped before release. <br />Table 5 <br />Sampling periods used during diel sampling <br />tor young Califonia squawfish <br />A-1 A-2 B-1 B-2 C-1 C-2 <br />!400 0400 0800 1200 1600 2000 24( <br />Military time <br />All habitat types found in proximity to a selected backwater were <br />sampled with a 1/4-inch (0.6 centimeter) mesh seine at the same time with <br />comparable effort. This allowed comparisons of the abundance of Colorado <br />squawfish in backwaters with other habitat types. <br />On October 9, 1980, the Vernal field office initiated a small <br />study in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation and Fish and Wildlife <br />Service (Division of Ecological Services). The objectives of this study <br />were two: (1) to determine if peaking power type releases from Flaming <br />Gorge Dam would have a measurable effect on backwater habitat (important <br />for young Colorado squawfish) as far downriver as Ouray, Utah; and <br />(2) to evaluate any potential effects on movement or habitat preferences <br />of young Colorado squawfish. <br />In order to monitor any effects a large backwater was selected <br />at RM 255.4 (409 kilometers) in stratum F. Samples of fish populations <br />were made as stated for the diel investigations. Depths and relative <br />size of the backwater and depth of the river was recorded each time fish <br />samples were taken. Noted effects were compared with the U.S. Geological <br />Survey (USGS) stream discharge monitoring station at Jensen, Utah. <br />Radiotelemetry of Colorado squawfish <br />A radiotelemetry program was initiated at the Vernal station in <br />March 1980. The objective of this work included an investigation of <br />major movements, habitat preference, and spawning of Colorado squawfish. <br />In addition to work done on the Colorado squawfish, observations were <br />also made on one razorback sucker. <br />During the spring of 1980, extensive sampling was conducted in <br />strata E and F to collect Colorado squawfish for use in radiotelemetry <br />studies. It is emphasized that these collections were biased in favor <br />of obtaining Colorado squawfish from habitats where they were most <br />abundant. ? Although cold weather made it difficult to collect fish, <br />the collections began in March so that the fish might recover from the <br />surgery before spawning season. Collections were initiated using trammel <br />• nets and electrofishing gear; however, trammel nets were discontinued <br />because of manpower shortages and a lack of success. Early efforts also <br />included the use of larger seines. These efforts were also terminated <br />because of manpower shortages. <br />15