My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7823
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7823
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:44:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7823
Author
Miller, W. H., et al.
Title
Colorado River Fishery Project, Part II, Final Report, Field Investigations.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
samples and reduce within-strata sampling variability. Criteria incorpo- <br />rated into the delineation of strata included both geophysical (river • <br />channel configuration, substrate types, gradient, and depth) and biolog- <br />ical parameters (productive bottomlands, sterile sand flats, productive <br />backwaters, swift canyons, and point sources of allochthonous organic <br />materials). <br />The six homogeneous strata were as follows: <br /> Len gth <br /> kilo- River <br />Stratum miles meters milesl/ Landmark description <br />A 71 114 222291 Turks Head to Labyrinth Canyon <br />B 37 59 94-131 Labyrinth Canyon to Gunnison <br /> Butte <br />C 24 38 132-156 Gunnison Butte to Three Ford's <br /> Rapid <br />D 54 86 157-211 Three Ford's Rapid to Duche's <br /> Hole <br />E 37 59 212-249 Duche's Hole to Duchesne River <br />F 70 112 250-320 Duchesne River to Split Mountain <br />1/ River mile from confluence of the Green and Colorado Rivers. <br />Sampling design and procedure <br />Sampling procedures were presented in Archer et al. (1979). During <br />the first year a random sampling design was utilized to establish the <br />sampling sequence. One stratum (B) was selected as the starting point <br />with the sampling series progressing sequentially downstream to the <br />last stratum, shifting back to the uppermost stratum to complete the <br />series. Within each stratum sample stations were selected according to a <br />random sampling design. In order to avoid sampling bias in the selection <br />of stations a table of random digits was consulted and the first number <br />encountered in the table that appeared in the section was chosen for <br />the first sample station. To permit replication and to insure that <br />representative stations were chosen, each station consisted of two <br />0.5-mile (0.8-kilometer) reaches; one extending downstream from the <br />selected river mile starting point, the other 5 miles (8 kilometers) <br />downstream (Figure 3). Standardized sampling began in the uppermost <br />0.5-mile (0.8-kilometer) reach continuing for 24 hours. The second day <br />the intervening 4.5-mile (7.2-kilometer) reach was surveyed by electro <br />fishing starting at the lower boundary of the previous sample station and <br />continuing downstream to the upstream point of the second 0.5-mile <br />(0.8-kilometer) station. From this point the second 0.5-mile (0.8- <br />kilometer) station was intensively sampled for 24 hours. <br />Within each 0.5-mile (0.8-kilometer) station discrete habitat <br />types were delineated, (Figure 4) and fish collections conducted within <br />them rather than across several habitats. This permitted a delineation <br />of habitat preferences for fish species with depths, velocities, and <br />substrates recorded for each subsample. • <br />Sampling was not only stratified spatially, but also temporarily <br />by day and season. Days were subdivided into three sampling periods <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.