Laserfiche WebLink
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />The Colorado River Fishery Report consists of a Summary Report <br />• (Part 1) which synthesizes and analyzes Field Investigations (Part 2) <br />and hatchery/laboratory Contracted Studies (Part 3). Those interested in <br />,methodology and details of each study should review Parts 2 and 3. <br />s <br />Findings <br />Colorado squawfish are widespread throughout the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin and do not appear to be concentrated in large numbers in any <br />one location. Numbers of Colorado squawfish appear to be less today than <br />10 to 20 years ago and may still be declining. Archer (1982) has calcu- <br />lated a 66 percent decline in juvenile and adult Colorado squawfish from <br />1960 to 1980. The decline in young-of-the-year is even greater with a <br />projected decline of 94 percent between 1960 and 1980. Spawning areas <br />seem to be limited and the life stages of greatest concern are those from <br />spawning through the first year. If adequate spawning and rearing areas <br />cannot be found, protected, and managed, then a species management <br />program with stocking would be required to ensure the continued existence <br />of the Colorado squawfish. Extensive movement of Colorado squawfish <br />was documented with total movement of some individuals over 200 miles. <br />Spawning, migration, and homing behavior was observed and one definite <br />Colorado squawfish spawning site was confirmed in the Yampa River. <br />Movement of Colorado squawfish between mainstem rivers and tributary <br />streams was documented. Blockage of migration routes may be a signifi- <br />cant factor in the decline of the species. <br />Humpback chubs are not wide ranging and are found primarily in four <br />locations (Black Rocks, Westwater Canyon, and Gray Canyon in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin and the Little Colorado River in the Lower Colorado <br />River Basin). Habitats differ slightly from area to area; however, the <br />chubs appear stable in three of the four locations. Only the Gray <br />Canyon population seems unstable and possibly decreasing at this time. <br />Given the deep and narrow canyon configuration of the Colorado River at <br />Black Rocks and Westwater Canyon, it does not appear that present flow <br />depletions and regulations are limiting factors to the chub in the Upper <br />Colorado River. However, some hybridization with roundtail chub has been <br />documented which may be related to changes in flow and/or temperature. <br />The humpback chubs are very sensitive to temperature and demonstrated a <br />need for temperatures of at least 16-18° C in the spring to successfully <br />spawn and have eggs hatch. Barring significant changes in their habitat <br />humpback chubs should be considered relatively secure at their present <br />population level at Black Rocks and Westwater Canyon in the Upper Basin <br />« and in the Little Colorado River in the Lower Basin. The Gray Canyon <br />population, found in the Green River, seems to be decreasing rapidly and <br />will require management programs in the near future if this population is <br />to be maintained. <br />Few, if any, bonytail chubs still exist in the Upper Basin. A <br />few individual bonytail were found in the Green River in Gray Canyon. <br />I