My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7822
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7822
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:43:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7822
Author
Miller, W. H., et al.
Title
Colorado River Fishery Project, Part I, Summary Report.
USFW Year
1982.
USFW - Doc Type
(contract no. 9-07-40-L-1016 with the Bureau of Reclamation),
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HABITAT AND GEOPHYSCIAL CHARACTER, UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN <br />The width, depth, and physical characteristics of streams of <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin vary greatly by geographic area and <br />with flow volume. Some of the deeper areas in the Upper Colorado <br />River were Cataract Canyon with maximum depths of 92 feet, and Black <br />Rocks and Westwater Canyons with maximum depths of about 60 feet. In the <br />Green River a maximum depth of about 60 feet was recorded for Gray Canyon <br />and up to 28-foot depths were recorded for the Lower Green River in <br />Labyrinth Canyon. Average depths for cross sections of the different <br />' river strata varied from about 2 feet to over 60 feet. <br />Various habitats in the Upper Colorado River were quantified at key <br />locations using computer modeling methodology developed by the FWS <br />IFG (Part 3, Report No. 1). Three hydraulic simulation stations were <br />established on the Green River: Mineral Bottom (RM 56), Gray Canyon <br />(RM 141), and Ouray (RM 248); and three stations on the Colorado River <br />at Potash (RM 53), Moab (RM 73), and Black Rocks (RM 136). Analyses <br />were made to evaluate potential habitats available for young squawfish <br />and adult humpback chub at these sites. <br />Flow changes in the Upper Colorado River were compared by hydrologic <br />time series at the six hydraulic stations. U.S. Geological Survey <br />(USGS) gaging station flow records for 1960-1980 were compared to <br />simulated flows depicting: (1) flow conditions without any development <br />and (2) flow conditions with 1980 development projected from historic <br />conditions. Temparature modeling was also done to determine the effect <br />of flow changes on river temperatures at the key hydraulic stations. <br />The IFG analysis shows significant peak flow reductions on both <br />the Green and Colorado Rivers. Average monthly peak flows in the Colo- <br />rado River have been reduced by about 35 percent and the Green River <br />has experienced similiar reductions of 25-40 percent. Instantaneous <br />peaks (daily maximum flows) have changed as indicated by an analysis of <br />the 10 percent exceedance flows for the period before major impoundments <br />and the period after. As shown in Table 1 the peak flow depletions in <br />May, June, and July have all been greater than 20 percent with maximum <br />depletions near 37 percent. Manipulation of flow regimens by reservoir <br />regulation has resulted in higher low flows (fall, and winter) and lower <br />peak flows (spring and early summer). <br />Table 1 <br />Changes in peak flow in the Green and <br />Colorado Rivers as a result of major _impoundments.!/ <br />Colorado River Green River <br />+ Month Percentage depletion?/ Month Percentage depletion <br />May 20.4 May 28.7 <br />June 34.6 June 36.9 <br />` July 36.7 July 36.5 <br />August 15.3 August 7.0 <br />1 Pre-impoundment period - Colorado River 1914-1965, Green River <br />1947-1962. Post-impoundment period - Colorado River 1969-1981, Green <br />River 1964-1981. A 2- to 4-year reservoir filling period was eliminated <br />from the analysis. <br />2/ Depletion percentages based on the changes in the 10 percent <br />exceedance flow parameter, i.e., an analysis of those peak flows occur- <br />ring 10 percent of the time before and after development. <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.