My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9477
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9477
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9477
Author
McAda, C. W.
Title
Flow Recommendations to Benefit Endangere Fishes in the Colorado and Gunnison Rivers.
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
Project number 54,
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
pikeminnow reproductive success. Reproductive success of razorback sucker was not <br />monitored in the Colorado River, but successful reproduction in the Green River was <br />associated with flows sufficient to inundate floodplains and provide warm, food-rich <br />environments for growth and survival of larval fish. Successful reproduction of these species <br />was associated with flows sufficient to clean cobble bars of fine sediments and provide <br />sediment-free interstitial spaces for incubation of eggs. Increased volume of interstitial spaces <br />was also associated with increased primary and secondary production in the Colorado and <br />Gunnison rivers. Abundance of three nonnative cyprinids (fathead minnow Pimephales <br />promelas, red shiner Cyprinella lutrensis, sand shiner Notropis stramineus) was reduced in <br />years with higher than average spring runoff. These three species are very abundant in some <br />reaches and may prey on or compete with young of the endangered fishes, especially Colorado <br />pikeminnow. Reduced abundance was temporary, but it may have reduced predation or <br />competition and allowed for increased survival of young Colorado pikeminnow in some years. <br />The endangered fishes use a variety of habitats depending on season and species. Adult <br />Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker prefer braided reaches that offer a suite of <br />habitats in proximity to one another. Humpback chub are restricted to canyon-bound reaches <br />and used eddies and pools during most of the year. Inundated floodplains provide warm, <br />food-rich environments for adult Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker in addition to <br />being critical for survival of larval razorback sucker. Young-of-the-year (YOY) Colorado <br />pikeminnow are dependent o.n backwaters in the lower Colorado River for nursery habitat. <br />Movement of fine sediment through the Colorado and Gunnison rivers is critical to <br />creation and maintenance of endangered-fish habitat. Flows equal to or greater than 1/2 <br />bankfull discharge carry 65-75% of the sediment load of the Colorado and Gunnison.rivers. <br />Flows. equal to_ or greater.than bankfull discharge create and maintain in-channel features such <br />as pools or side channels and provide inundated floodplains. Bankfull discharge also moves <br />sediments to create and maintain backwaters, but low, stables flows are necessary to make <br />backwaters available to YOY Colorado pikeminnow following the summer spawning period. <br />Overall, a more naturally shaped hydrograph is necessary to create and maintain habitats for <br />the endangered fishes and to provide needed habitats at the correct time. <br />Flow recommendations for the Colorado and Gunnison rivers were developed using a <br />lines-of-evidence approach similar to that used to develop flow recommendations for the <br />Green River (Muth et al. 2000). Specific relationships between biological response and river <br />flow were used to quantify, the underlying cause for the biological response; e.g., sediment <br />transport that improved hatching success or increased primary production. Flows that create <br />and maintain riverine habitats that are critical to the endangered fishes (e.g., backwaters or <br />floodplains) were also considered in developing the recommendations. The fundamental basis <br />of flow recommendations for the Colorado and Gunnison rivers reflect general guidelines for <br />river restoration proposed by experts in the field; partial restoration of natural functions that <br />benefit the riverine ecosystem were hypothesized to benefit the endangered fishes as. well. <br />The goal of these recommendations is to provide the annual and seasonal patterns of flow <br />in the Gunnison River and in the Colorado River downstream from their confluence to <br />Final Report xx July 2003
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.