My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9436
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9436
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:40:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9436
Author
McAda, C. W.
Title
Subadult and Adult Colorado Pikeminnow Monitoring; Summary of Results, 1986-2000.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Recovery Program Project Number 22,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
It may also reflect the larger sample sizes resulting from more samples being taken from more <br />extensive reaches of the Colorado River. Smaller Colorado pikeminnow maybe under <br />represented in samples from the other rivers as well. Alternately, very large Colorado <br />pikeminnow can sometimes be more difficult to capture than smaller specimens because of <br />their weight or violent reaction to the anode (personal observation). However, size structure <br />determined by ISMP is accurate as possible using electrofishing as the primary collection <br />technique. <br />Data collected during ISMP and other studies were used to develop preliminary estimates <br />of survival and population rates of change for the Colorado pikeminnow population in the <br />upper basin (K. Bestgen, personal communication). Although outside the scope of the <br />original intention of ISMP, further analysis of these two parameters would supplement the <br />trend information provided by CPE and the population estimates currently being developed <br />for the rivers of the upper basin. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />Consistent increase in electrofishing CPE in all rivers sampled by ISMP indicates that the <br />Colorado pikeminnow population in the upper Colorado River basin increased from 1986 to <br />2000. This increase was most dramatic in the Green and White rivers, but an increase also <br />occurred in the Colorado and Yampa rivers. <br />Developing CPE indices using shoreline electrofishing is a valid method of determining <br />trends in Colorado pikeminnow populations. However, CPE values must change substantially <br />for significant differences to be detected and their inherent variability often requires several <br />years of data before an increase or decrease in relative abundance can be determined. In <br />addition, an estimate of population abundance can not be made using CPE alone. Although <br />all fish were marked before release, the study design did not allow development of robust <br />population estimates using mark-recapture techniques. Shoreline electrofishing is a valid <br />method of capturing Colorado pikeminnow for population estimates, but the study design <br />should be developed specifically for that purpose. <br />Alternately, studies that utilize one-pass electrofishing to develop relative abundance data <br />can be reinitiated when relationships between CPE and population size are identified (i.e. fish <br />capture efficiency) and mark-recapture population estimates are no longer necessary. <br />Sampling reaches should encompass as much of occupied habitat as possible and should be <br />selected randomly to provide an improved study design. <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.