Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br />6 <br />5 <br />-~ 4 <br />~. <br />r 3 <br />a 2 <br />V 1 <br />~-- 0 <br />W <br />a 7 <br />= 6 <br />~ 5 <br />~ 4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />0 <br />Upper Green River <br />------- ------------------------ <br />i <br />86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 <br />Lower Green River <br />----------------------------------- --------- - <br />- -~--~---U-- ---------=-------- <br />86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 <br />Year <br />FIGURE 4. -- Mean CPE (CPM/hr) of Colorado pikeminnow in upper (1, 2, and 3) <br />and lower (4 and 5) reaches of the Green River,1986--2000. Vertical bars represent 95% <br />confidence intervals; regression results are provided in Tabie A-9. <br />Colorado River. - The slope of the regression line for the Colorado River was <br />significantly greater than 0; however, visual inspection of the data shows two groups of years <br />when catch rates were uniform, with no consistent increase (Figure 5). Mean CPE fluctuated <br />around 0.25 CPM/hr in 1986-1990 and increased to about 1 CPM/hr in 1992-1998. Mean <br />CPE for most years in the early group were significantly different from years in the later <br />group, but the transition year of 1991 was not significantly different from years in either <br />group (Fisher's LSD; Table A-10). Mean CPE dropped in 1999 and 2000; mean CPE in 2000 <br />was significantly less than CPE in 1995-1998, but CPE in 1999 was not (Table A-10). <br />Trends in CPE by reach were similar to the river-wide trend (Figure 6); low levels in <br />1986-1990 with higher levels in 1992-1998. However, CPE continued its upward trend <br />through 1999 in the upper river and didn't drop off until 2000. Mean CPE in the lower river <br />declined in 1999. <br />10 <br />