Laserfiche WebLink
7. Pearson correlation coefficients of mean catch rates among red shiner, - <br /> sand shiner, fathead minnow, YOY Colorado pikeminnow, and other <br /> native species combined (other)..... .............................. 18 <br />8. Flow variables that were significantly correlated (Pearson correlation <br /> coefficient; P<0.05) with annual fall catch rates of YOY Colorado <br /> pikeminnow, red shiner, sand shiner (no significant correlations), fathead <br /> minnow, and other native species (Other) ................................ 19 <br /> <br /> <br />9. <br />Results of multiple regression relating catch rates of red shiner (RS), sand t? <br />f= <br /> shiner (SS), fathead minnow (FH) and the three species combined <br /> (RS+SS+FH) to various flow parameters ................................ 20 <br />10. Factor loadings of flow variables for factors 1 and 2 ........................ 20 <br />11. Mean of the combined catch rates for red shiner (RS), sand shiner (SS) <br /> and fathead minnow {FM, and the associated group used for discriminant <br /> analysis. ....... ...... .................... ................ 22 <br />12. Means of flow variables used in discriminant analysis to predict correct <br /> group of combined catch rates for red shiner, sand shiner, and fathead <br /> minnow. .............. ........ ................... ......... 22 <br />i <br />13. Ranked geometric-mean CPE for YOY Colorado pikeminnow and <br /> results of Kruskal-Wallis multiple-comparison z-value test. : ................. 27 <br />14. Multiple regression results showing independent variables used to predict <br /> YOY Colorado pikeminnow abundance in 1982-1996. ...... .... 28 ?. ; <br /> IJ <br />15. Groupings of YOY Colorado pikeminnow abundance for principal <br /> components analysis and discriminant analysis . ........................... 28 <br />16. Means of flow variables used in multiple discriminant analysis for each <br /> YOY Colorado pikeminnow abundance group .................. ........ 30 <br />17. Relationship between mean length of YOY Colorado pikeminnow in fall <br /> and accumulated temperature units ..................................... 31 <br />18. Comparison of mean CPE for Colorado pikeminnow in fall and the <br /> following spring in Reach 1 (RM 0-110). versus the lower 64 miles of the <br /> same reach, fall 1988-spring 1997. ......... . ... . ... .............. 32 <br /> t <br />19. Mean total length of Colorado pikeminnow in fall and mean total length } <br /> of Colorado pikeminnow the following spring, lower Colorado River, fall <br /> 1988-spring 1997. ......... ............................:....... 34 <br /> i if L,l <br />