Laserfiche WebLink
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />An important recent initiative of the Recovery Program for the endangered Colorado <br />River fishes has been control of introduced fishes. Introduced species have been implicated <br />in the decline of endangered fishes nation wide because of predation or competition for food <br />or space. A survey of knowledgeable upper-basin biologists identified several species that <br />are believed to have negative effects on the endangered fishes of the upper Colorado River <br />basin; 46% of respondents believed northern pike Esox lucius to be an important problem for <br />the native fish community. <br />Northern pike were stocked into Paonia Reservoir on the North Fork of the Gunnison <br />River in 1969 and 1971. Some fish escaped and established a small population within critical <br />habitat on the Gunnison River near Delta, Colorado. No reproduction has been documented <br />in the Gunnison River and the population apparently relies on continued escapement from <br />Paonia Reservoir to maintain itself. This study was conducted to determine if the population <br />could be substantially reduced through mechanical removal. <br />Previous work identified a 16-km-long river reach downstream from Hartland <br />Diversion where most northern pike were collected. Sampling efforts targeted that reach. <br />Sampling was concentrated in spring when high water provided quiet, off-channel habitats <br />that were believed to attract northern pike. Workers used electrofishing, fyke nets and <br />trammel nets to intensively sample areas where northern pike had been collected in the past. <br />In contrast with other studies, shoreline electrofishing was the most effective sampling <br />technique for collecting northern pike in the Gunnison River. <br />A total of ten northern pike were collected and removed from the study area in 1995 <br />and 1996. Six of those pike were captured on the first day of sampling in 1995. Intensive <br />sampling by two-person crews for 27 more days captured three more northern pike. <br />Thirteen days of sampling in 1996 captured one additional northern pike. One pike was <br />observed that could not be captured. The abrupt decline in catch per effort and the sustained <br />low catch rate thereafter indicate that a small population with limited recruitment can be <br />substantially reduced with mechanical means. It is unlikely that all northern pike occupying <br />iv <br />