My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8005
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:40:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8005
Author
McAda, C. W.
Title
Mechanical Removal Of Northern Pike From The Gunnison River, 1995-1996.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
58,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
One northern pike was observed in a small, relatively shallow backwater during 'scare <br />and snare.' The fish surfaced in front of the net immediately after the mouth was blocked. <br />The fish had apparently detected the net and avoided moving into it. Considerable time was <br />spent covering the backwater and trying to drive the fish into the net. Two investigators <br />started at the upper end and drove toward the net causing considerable commotion and <br />thrashing through the available vegetation. Two complete drives were made through the <br />backwater, but the pike was not captured even though the mouth was completely blocked. <br />Apparently it was able to avoid the people in the backwater and not be driven into the net. <br />No electrofishing boat was available on that day to shock the backwater. <br />The smallest northern pike captured was 35 cm long and the largest was 86 cm long. <br />Most of the fish were between 50 and 75 cm long (Figure 4). This size structure was very <br />similar to that observed by Burdick (1995). Burdick PIT tagged seven of the 15 fish that he <br />collected within the 95-96 study area. Only two tagged fish were recaptured during this <br />study. All pike collected in this study were captured from the same areas as Burdick (1995; <br />Figure 5) except that none were captured above Hartland Diversion because it was not <br />sampled. As mentioned above, Burdick collected 13 pike in a 3.1-km-long reach below <br />Hartland Diversion. Ten of those fish were caught in or near a large backwater at RK 86.7. <br />Most of the fish captured in this study were also collected near that backwater. <br />Other species captured during this study included bluehead sucker Catostomus <br />discobolus, flannelmouth sucker C. latipinnis, roundtail chub :Gila robusta, brown trout <br />Salmo trutta, rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, common carp Cyprinus carpio, black <br />bullhead Ameiurus metal, green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus, white sucker C. commersoni, and <br />hybrids between white sucker and bluehead and flannelmouth suckers (Tables A-1 and A-2). <br />The introduced white sucker was the most common species captured in both electrofishing <br />and fyke net collections. The two salmonid species were most common in electrofishing <br />collections immediately below Hartland Diversion and were rarely collected in the flood <br />plain. Green sunfish and black bullhead were exclusively collected from floodplain <br />habitats-they were not captured in mainstem electrofishing collections. All green sunfish <br />and black bullhead encountered were humanely sacrificed and removed from the river. The <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.