My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8005
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:40:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8005
Author
McAda, C. W.
Title
Mechanical Removal Of Northern Pike From The Gunnison River, 1995-1996.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
58,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STUDY GOAL AND OBJECTIVES <br />Goal: Prevent colonization of restored flooded-bottomland habitats by introduced predators, <br />especially northern pike. <br />Objectives: 1. Evaluate standard techniques for efficient removal of nonnative predators. <br />2. Estimate relative decline in nonnative predators as a result of fish removal. <br />3. Determine short-term reinfiltration rates of nonnative predators back into <br />important habitats. <br />METHODS <br />Burdick (1995) identified locations and time periods when nonnative predators were <br />concentrated. As noted above, all but two of the northern pike collected by Burdick were <br />between river kilometer (RK; distance upstream from confluence with Colorado River) 86.7 <br />and 117.8. Further, 13 of those 18 fish were collected in a 2.9-km-long reach immediately <br />below Hartland Diversion (RK 96.4). Two of the remaining pike were captured in a flooded <br />area at RK 86.7 and three were captured upstream from Hartland Diversion. For this study, <br />sampling efforts were concentrated in a 16-km-long reach downstream from Hartland <br />Diversion (Figure 1) where Burdick (1995) captured 15 northern pike. Three different <br />sampling gears (electrofishing, trammel nets, and fyke nets) were used to collect fish during <br />the 2-year study. Electrofishing was used in shoreline habitats when water conditions were <br />suitable. Water level was generally too low to shock effectively during summer and too high <br />for safe sampling during peak runoff. Quiet-water habitats were sampled with- trammel nets <br />and fyke nets. Trammel nets were usually used as part of the 'scare and snare' technique <br />(blocking the mouth of a backwater and driving fish into the net by creating a disturbance in <br />the backwater; sensu Osmundson and Burnham 1996), but were also used in stationary sets <br />for one or two hours at a time. Fyke nets were used in overnight sets in flooded areas out of <br />the main current where northern pike might be expected to congregate. They were set in a <br />variety of quiet, flooded-vegetation habitats including an old oxbow where Burdick (1995) <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.