Laserfiche WebLink
?J <br /> <br />CPE alone was not providing an accurate index of relative abundance every fall. They felt <br />' that estimates of relative abundance could be improved by measuring the number and surface <br />area of backwaters within ISMP reaches. Therefore, aerial video was incorporated into <br />' ISMP on a trial basis to examine its potential for measuring number and surface area of <br />backwaters and improving the annual estimate of relative abundance. It was felt that a gross <br />estimate of total number of small Colorado squawfish could be obtained by multiplying mean <br />' CPE by total area of backwaters. <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />L <br />This report evaluated three years of ISMP data collected in conjunction with aerial video <br />enumeration of backwater number and area. Aerial video was collected over relatively short <br />periods of time, while ISMP sampling (which the video was designed to supplement) often <br />required considerably longer. Streamflow, and therefore backwater area, could change <br />markedly during the interval between backwater measurement and fish collections, <br />introducing substantial error into the calculations. Large flow changes occurred during the <br />data collection period in every reach at least once during the three years reported here. <br />These flow changes introduce considerable error into calculations that appear to be quite <br />precise. Using these numbers to estimate total number of post-larval Colorado squawfish <br />implies more precision than actually exists. Mean CPE and the estimated number of <br />Colorado squawfish were positively correlated with each other in many instances examined in <br />this report. However, it is impossible to determine whether Gmean CPE or estimated total <br />number of fish is more accurate when the two variables are not closely correlated with each <br />other. The correlations and the potential for unmeasurable error indicate that estimating <br />backwater error does not add to mean CPE as an index to relative abundance of Colorado <br />squawfish. Because of high cost and the long period required for data analysis, aerial video <br />should not become an annual component of ISMP. <br />Aerial video has provided important information about physical habitat in the large <br />rivers of the Upper Colorado River Basin and can continue to do so. It is an important <br />component of a nursery habitat study being conducted by UDVWR--its importance to ISMP <br />can be reassessed at the conclusion of that study. Measurement of physical habitat with <br />aerial video could also contribute to studies monitoring long-term channel changes in the <br />upper basin. Evaluating large-scale channel changes may be a more suitable use for aerial <br />video than trying to make precise measurements of backwater area and number. <br />21