Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />abundance indices when backwater area was considered. Mean CPE rose and fell with <br />changes in estimated abundance of small Colorado squawfish in most cases. However, we , <br />can not determine whether the estimated number of fish is truly representative of the total <br />number of fish available. We could calculate confidence intervals for a population estimate, ' <br />but confidence intervals imply more precision than is truly present in the estimates. <br />Although the number implies information about total number of fish available, it is still only <br />an index to their relative abundance, just as CPE is. Furthermore, unmeasured changes in ' <br />backwater area (because of changes in streamflow) between video collection and ISMP <br />sampling will add considerable unmeasured error to any estimate of fish abundance. The ' <br />question then becomes whether aerial video should become part of the monitoring program <br />simply to supply total surface area of backwaters and allow this calculation. Based on the <br />cost of the program and the small amount of additional information provided (with its ' <br />unmeasurable potential error), it is difficult to justify aerial video as an annual component of <br />ISMP. 1 <br />Making other changes in fall monitoring of YOY Colorado squawfish might make more <br />improvements in the program than were observed by measuring backwater area from aerial , <br />video. However, these other additions have negative aspects as well. Simply increasing the <br />number of seine hauls taken during ISMP will improve the reliability of CPE as an index of , <br />relative abundance. However, as pointed out by McAda (1989), increasing the sample size <br />(number of seine hauls) by 100% only results in a 5 to 20% 'improvement' in abundance <br />indices (determined by the power to detect significant changes in CPE with appropriate , <br />statistical tests). The increased manpower required by the additional sampling effort must be <br />evaluated when considering changes to the program. <br />Refining the criteria used to select sampling sites might also improve reliability of fall ' <br />ISMP monitoring. The monitoring program records water temperature and estimates depth <br />and total surface area in the sampled backwaters, and provides minimum criteria that <br />backwaters must meet before being sampled. These criteria attempt to reduce variability by ' <br />restricting sampling to habitats more heavily used by YOY Colorado squawfish. Haines and <br />Tyus (1990) reported that YOY Colorado squawfish in the Green River were most abundant <br />in backwaters > 15 cm deep, but detected no selection for backwater size (surface area). <br />They also reported no apparent selection for water temperature in fall. In contrast, Tyus and <br />Haines (1991) reported a slight (but not significant) preference for larger and warmer ' <br />backwaters. ISMP samples only backwaters with surface area greater than 30 mZ and <br />maximum depth greater than 30 cm (unless the water is turbid). These restrictions on ' <br />backwater depth and size already consider the limited preferences identified above. Further <br />analysis of these physical data may help us understand more about habitat preferences of <br />18 <br />