My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7733
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7733
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:39:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7733
Author
McAda, C. W.
Title
Evaluation of Aerial-Video Measurement of Backwaters as Part of the Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program for Age-0 Colorado Squawfish.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />In the laboratory, the video images were viewed on color monitors and captured in <br />' continuous overlapping frames along the length of the four study sites. The captured frames <br />were labeled to one-tenth of a river mile at the center of the frame. Backwaters and side <br />channels were identified and delineated on each frame. Channel width was measured at the <br />center of the frame. Number and area of side channels and backwaters, and channel width <br />were stored in text files and later loaded into a data management program. Each feature was <br />' identified by river mile (±0.1 mi). Complete details on collection and interpretation of <br />video data are provided by Pucherelli et al. (1990). A report describing the 1989 to 1991 <br />' video data in more detail than intended here is being prepared by the Bureau. <br />This report summarizes.-only the video data describing number and area of backwaters <br />within the monitoring reaches.-- Computer files containing raw data were provided to the <br />Service by the Bureau. Number, area, and mean area of backwaters greater than 30 m2 in <br />' area (the minimum size of backwater sampled during ISMP) were summarized by monitoring <br />reach and by ten-mile intervals within each reach. These values were then compared with <br />' YOY Colorado squawfish data collected within each reach. <br />River Discharge <br />Mean-daily streamflow for the dates when ISMP sampling occurred and when aerial <br />' video was collected was obtained from USGS stream gauges. One USGS gauge occurs <br />within each of the four ISMP reaches (Figure 1). Total backwater area within each reach <br />was regressed against mean-daily streamflow on the day when video was collected to <br />' examine the relationship between the two parameters. Mean-daily streamflow was averaged <br />when video collection required more than one day. <br />YOY Colorado Squawfish <br />' Fall YOY Colorado squawfish monitoring data were collected by the Utah Division of <br />Wildlife Resources (UDWR) and Colorado Division of Wildlife (UDWR) according to <br />' criteria specified in the Monitoring Program Handbook (USFWS 1987). To compensate for <br />Colorado squawfish that might have been too small to identify in the field, and thus were not <br />' counted, samples identified in the laboratory were used to develop a 'correction factor.' This <br />correction factor was based upon the ratio of Colorado squawfish found in preserved samples <br />to those identified in the field. The number of Colorado squawfish found in unpreserved <br />' samples was multiplied by this number before catch-per-effort calculations were made <br />(Appendix Table Al). <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.