Laserfiche WebLink
<br />upper end of occupied habitat and proceeded downstream, sampling the first backwater they <br />located in each five-mile reach. Early investigations also included seining habitats adjacent <br />to the sampled backwaters. However, the program was soon standardized to sample only <br />backwaters because it was assumed that changes in numbers within backwaters also reflected <br />changes in other habitats. The Biological Subcommittee used this annual inventory as the <br />basis for the post-larval Colorado squawfish portion of ISMP. <br />The Biological Subcommittee utilized the four important nursery habitat areas in the <br />Green and Colorado rivers for the post-larval portion of ISMP (Table 1; Figure 1). The <br />states of Utah and Colorado were given primary responsibility for sampling reaches within <br />their borders. The Service and Bureau would provide support when necessary. Each reach <br />was divided into five-mile subreaches which formed the basis for the sampling-design. The <br />sampling crew began at the top of the reach and traveled downstream until it reached a <br />backwater which it sampled with a 1/8-inch-mesh seine. Two non-overlapping seine hauls <br />were taken in the backwater. Effort was recorded as area swept by the seine. Colorado <br />squawfish were measured, counted, and released alive if they were large enough to be <br />reliably identified. All remaining fish in the first sample were preserved for later <br />identification in the laboratory to check for Colorado squawfish too small to be identified in <br />the field. The investigators then proceeded downstream to the next backwater which was <br />also sampled with two non-overlapping seine hauls. Colorado squawfish were measured, <br />counted, and released alive. No fish from the second backwater were preserved. The <br />investigators then proceeded downstream to the top of the next five-mile reach before <br />sampling again. Samples were not taken within a five-mile reach if no backwaters meeting <br />ISMP's criteria were found. To ensure that sampling would be consistent among the many <br />investigators who would participate in ISMP, a handbook was developed that outlined the <br />sampling program in considerable detail (USFWS 1987). Standard data forms, encoding <br />instructions, and a database management system were also developed. <br />The relative density, or catch per effort (CPE), of post-larval Colorado squawfish was <br />determined by the number collected per area of backwater swept with the seine. CPE for <br />each reach was calculated as the mean of all seine hauls taken within the reach. Because of <br />the relatively low number of Colorado squawfish collected every year, the data are not <br />normally distributed--an assumption required by many data analysis techniques. McAda <br />(1989) investigated several methods of data analysis for the monitoring program and <br />suggested using geometric-mean CPE rather than the more standard calculation of arithmetic <br />mean. The geometric mean is calculated by using a log transformation (lo&(CPE + 1)) on <br />individual seine hauls before calculating the mean. The mean of the log values is then <br />transformed back to a standard value. A log transformation improves the normality of CPE <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />