My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7615
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:39:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7615
Author
McAda, C. W.
Title
Evaluation of the Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />Statistical Power of the Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program <br />The statistical power of the ISMP was examined to determine the ability of the <br />program to detect future changes in the populations of the rare fishes. The <br />data were examined in two ways: (1) the ability to detect changes from one year <br />to the next (T test) and (2) the ability to detect changes over a 5-year period <br />(F test). Analysis was based on 'normal' (parametric) statistical tests which <br />have assumptions that may not be met by these data. However, the results are <br />sufficient to provide accurate information about the predictive ability of the <br />monitoring program. <br />The analysis was based on the mean of the three years of data collected to date. <br />The annual mean catch per unit effort (CPUE) and standard deviation were <br />calculated for each river and reach sampled in both age-0 and adult Colorado <br />squawfish monitoring. The three-year mean of those values was then used in the <br />calculations. The three-year mean was used to reduce the variability that <br />occurred when each year was analyzed separately and is a better variable to use <br />for general prediction purposes. To examine the influence of increased sample <br />size on the power of the program, calculations were done using the sample size <br />resulting from the current program and for double the sample size of the current <br />program. All calculations were done using the transformations described above. <br />Power calculations were not done for humpback chub monitoring because of the <br />limited data available and because changes in the ratio of humpback chub to <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.