Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 4. Total number of introduced predators observed during Spring, <br />Late-Juvenile/Adult Colorado squawfish monitoring, 1988. <br /> TOTAL NUMBER OBSERVED <br />--- <br />--------- <br />REACH ---------- <br />NORTHERN ---------- ---------------------- <br />LARGEMOUTH SMALLMOUTH GREEN <br />RIVER CODE PIKE WALLEYE BASS BASS SUNFISH <br />Green 1 4 0 0 0 '~ 0 <br />2 8 2 0 0 0 <br />3 9 1 0 ,~ _ 0 0 <br />4 2 2 0 0 0 <br />5 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Colorado 6 0 0 0 0 0 <br />7 0 0 0 0 0 <br />8 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Yampa 9 0 0 0 0 0 <br />10 0 0 0 0 0 <br />11 0 0 0 0 0 <br />White 12 0 0 0 0 0 <br />13 0 0 0 0 0 <br />FALL, POST-LARVAL, AGE-0 COLORADO SQUAWFISH <br />Methods <br />Post-larval Colorado squawfish monitoring was conducted between 20 September and <br />10 October in four river reaches--two in the Green River and two in the Colorado <br />River (Table 5; Figure 2). Sampling was done with 1/8-inch-ace-mesh beach <br />seines, 15 ft long by 4 ft deep. Investigators divided each river reach to be <br />sampled into 5-mi sections. Sampling crews began at the upstream 5-mi section <br />and traveled downstream until they located the first suitable backwater (at least <br />30 m2 in size and at least 1 ft deep at its deepest point)--defined as a~primary <br />backwater. The backwater was then sampled with two non-overlapping seines hauls <br />which encompassed at least 25~ of the backwaters surface area. The crew then <br />traveled downstream until they located a second suitable backwater--the secondary <br />backwater--and sampled it in the same manner. If a secondary backwater was not <br />found before reaching the end of the 5-mi reach, no additional sampling was done. <br />This sampling procedure was then repeated in the next 5-mi reach. <br />5 <br />