Laserfiche WebLink
HUMPBACK CHUB MONITORING <br />Methods <br />Humpback chub monitoring was conducted in September in Black Rocks and Westwater <br />Canon on the Colorado River (Figure 3). Sampling was done using trammel--nets <br />set about 1500 hr and checked regularly until dark. All captured fish were <br />identified and enumerated. All Gila were photographed against .a white background <br />with a 1-cm-grid pattern and given a numbered tag before release. In addition, <br />seven morphomeristic measurements and counts were taken from each fish before <br />release: total length, depth of nuchal depression, length of dorsal-fin base, <br />length of anal-fin base, weight, number of principal dorsal and anal-fin rays. <br />Black Rocks <br />135-136 <br />Westwater , <br />Canyon <br />114-122 <br />Dolores River <br />o ~ 20 <br />~ ~ <br />Green River <br />Grand Junction <br />Figure 3.--River reaches sampled during humpback chub monitoring. <br />Results <br />A total of 103 humpback chub was collected in Westwater Canyon and 53 were <br />collected in Black Rocks (Table 8). Humpback chub was the most common fish <br />collected in each river reach, followed in abundance by roundtail chub and <br />channel catfish. Only four Gila were captured that could not be categorized as <br />humpback chub or roundtail chub. Relatively few individuals of other species <br />were collected (Table 8). <br />Morphometric measurements for the Gila collected during the sampling are provided <br />in Table 9. <br />9 <br />