Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:.I conductivity are characteristically high. Tributaries in the headwater <br />regions of the large rivers are cool and clear and often support trout. <br />Tributaries at lower elevations rarely contain gamefish. <br />The rivers of the study area drain into the Colorado and Green Rivers. <br />These two large rivers are subject to less fluctuation in flow than the <br />smaller streams and support a more varied fish population. Trout can be <br /> found in some sections of the large rivers, but warm water species are the <br /> dominant gamefish. Suckers and minnows are abundant throughout the two <br />rivers. <br />MATERIALS AND METHODS <br />Literature Search <br />Fish collection record: from the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources <br />(UDWR) and other sources were reviewed to determine fish distribution in <br />the NRL. From this data, streams on which little or no information was <br />available were identified and listed as sampling sites for further field <br />investigations. <br />Published literature on fish life history was also reviewed and a <br />brief summary of the life history of each rare fish completed. The life <br />history summaries are intended as a guide to the literature if more de- <br />tailed information is required. Distribution of fish of unusual interest <br />was shown on small scale topographic maps (U.S.G.S, 1:250,000). <br />Hydrologic, temperature and conductance data was compiled from <br />information collected by the U.S. Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) at stations <br />within the NRL (Figure 2). Discharge for each calender year (1970-1974) <br />was summarized as: total discharge (CFS), mean CFS, maximum CFS, and <br />minimum CFS. Instantaneous discharge (CFS), temperature and conductance <br />11