Laserfiche WebLink
I . <br />List of Tables <br />Table 1. Recovery elements and components, and percent of expenditures found in annual Program <br />Guidance for Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin, fiscal years 1996-1998 (USDI 1995, 1996, 1997) . ................ <br />Table 2. Nonnative fish stocking scenarios and fishes mentioned in the Procedures for Stocking <br />Nonnative Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin . .......................... . <br />Table 3. Key provisions and components of the Procedures for Stocking Nonnative Fish Species in the <br />J?Vpgr Colorado River Basin discussed with the Colorado Wildlife Commission 8 August 97 <br />potentially requiring regulatory attention Page numbers and items referenced refer to the <br />finalized Procedures (Appendix A) ............................................... <br />Table 4. Summary of habitat suitability scores for the proposed enlargement of Elkhead Reservoir for <br />northern pike, channel catfish (reproducing and stocked), smallmouth bass and largemouth bass <br />based on model application found in Appendix D; and habitat suitability scores for black <br />crappie, common carp, white sucker, yellow perch, and stocked rainbow trout based on <br />McConnell et al. (1984) ....................................................... . <br />Table 5. Total number of ponds and numbers of ponds by floodplain or of undetermined floodplain <br />position along the Colorado and Gunnison rivers within Critical Habitat. ................. <br />Table 6. Comparison of flood hydrologic data for river reaches and ponds managed by Colorado Division <br />of Wildlife (CROW) within Critical Habitat of the Colorado River in Colorado. Table contains <br />data combined from FEMA (1992) and CWCB (1995) .............................. . <br />Table 7. Estimated cost to construct berms averaging four feet in height and to rip-rap portions of berms <br />facing or adjacent to current (presumably one-half of the berds length) for public ponds <br />currently managed as sport fisheries by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Shoreline <br />development factors estimated visually from diagrams found in Elmblad and Satterfield <br />(1995). ............ <br />Table 8. Estimated costs to isolate privately owned ponds using dikes averaging 4 feet in height and rip- <br />rapped for one-half of their length within the 50 year floodplain of the Colorado River in the <br />Grand Valley from Palisade to Loma. An overall estimated shoreline development factor of 1.5 <br />was used to calculate shoreline length based on pond surface area ....................... <br />Table 9. Summary of documented illicit transfer of nonnative warmwater fish species in western <br />Colorado in 1980s and 1990s . .................................................. <br />10 <br />12 <br />14 <br />15 <br />17 <br />17 <br />20 <br />vi