My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8174
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8174
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:37:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8174
Author
Martinez, P. J.
Title
West Slope Warmwater Fisheries.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />This agreed upon requirement for berming raised questions among the Wildlife Commission, CDOW <br />administrators, and the public about the potential cost of constructing berms along/around floodplain ponds. <br />I contacted Bill Elmblad (CDOW) and requested that he seek cost estimate for these potential construction <br />costs. He obtained a cursory estimate from a local gravel/construction company that formed the basis for cost <br />estimates for constructing and reinforcing berms with rip-rap (Appendix D). To expand these cost estimates, <br />costs were summarized and described as follows: <br />Cost to build dike one foot high, 15 feet wide on top, and 1,000 feet long ............... $ 9,000 <br />Cost to rip-rap dike one foot high on just the outside face at a thickness of 1.5 feet ........ $ 4,800 <br />For any dike of additional height, multiply above costs by each additional one foot increment, e.g.: <br />-- 3 foot high dike, ............ ......................................... $27,000 <br />-- rip-rapped its entire length .............................................. $14,400 <br />--total ................................................................ $41,400 <br />It appears from Ehtnblad's example using Corn Lake (Appendix E), which was based on the review <br />by CWCB (1995), that the entire pond perimeter would not have to be rip-rapped; only those portions of the <br />dike affected by flowing water require rip-rap. CWCB (1995) provides suggested specifications for dike <br />slopes and dimensions, but I am uncertain how these compare to FEMA standards. <br />Corn Lake is approximately 10 surface acres. I used an estimated shoreline development factor of <br />1.2 to calculate a shoreline length of 2,907 feet. From the CWCB report it is estimated that to protect Corn <br />Lake for up to a 50 yr flood would require a 2,800 foot long levee system averaging four feet in height (it <br />would still be 15 feet wide on top). Based on the flowing water criterion, Elmblad estimated that a 1,000 foot <br />segment of the dike would have to be rip-rapped to prevent erosion. Based on this information, it would cost <br />an estimated $100,800 to install the dike and $19,200 to protect a segment of the dike from flowing water for <br />an estimated total cost of $120,000. Note that these cost estimates do not include installation of a screen to <br />control fish escapement. Using estimated shoreline development factors for the eight floodplain ponds for <br />which CDOW prepared LMPs (Elmblad et al. 1994), I calculated an estimated total cost to construct berms <br />for these public waters (Table 7). <br />I took this exercise one step further by estimating the potential cost to construct berms for the <br />privately owned pond resource within the 50 year floodplain of the Grand valley from the town of Palisade <br />downstream to Loma. By categorizing ponds based on surface area, < 1 acre, 1-10 acres, 10-20 acres and <br />ponds over 20 acres, and using an overall estimate of 1.5 for shoreline development, I calculated a weighted <br />mean shoreline length for each category of ponds and used this value multiplied by the number of ponds in <br />each size category to estimate total shoreline length. Again, berm costs were based on an average height of 4 <br />feet, with 1/2 of the berm length being rip-rapped to prevent erosion (Table 8). Although this exercise <br />provides a "what-if' glimpse of potential cost of berming ponds, berm construction and rip-rap in the <br />floodplain is generally strongly discouraged (T. Ireland, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, personal <br />communication). <br />16
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.